SCOTLAND'S former justice secretary has said a man in US custody on suspicion of building the bomb that downed Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie in 1988 – killing 270 people – was “always high on the list” of suspects.
US officials said on Sunday that Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi had been detained.
But the father of one of the victims said he wants to see the suspect tried before a UN court as opposed to one in the US or Scotland.
Speaking to the BBC, Kenny MacAskill – who as justice secretary opted to release Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds in 2009 after he was convicted of the bombing – said Mas’ud was always a person of interest in the investigation.
READ MORE: Chinese spy row: Police Scotland visit Glasgow's Loon Fung restaurant
“Mas’ud’s involvement has always been suspected, he was always high on the list and was one of the original suspects wanted by the authorities at the outset,” he told Good Morning Scotland on Monday.
“The only surprise is that he’s now been apprehended, they’ve been looking for him for a while, Gaddafi would never release him. When Gaddafi was toppled, those warlord factions might have hated each other but they equally both hated the USA so they were never prepared to release him, so how the USA have managed to spring him I don’t know.”
It is not clear how Mas’ud was apprehended by US officials.
In 2020, Mas’ud was charged by the US Attorney General William Barr with being the third person involved in the terrorist attack.
At the time, he was said to be in Libyan custody and Mr Barr said US authorities would work “arm in arm” with their Scottish counterparts.
Mr Barr said: “Let there be no mistake, no amount of time or distance will stop the US and our Scottish partners from pursuing justice in this case.”
Meanwhile, Dr Jim Swire told the same programme that the US or Scotland should not be tasked with trying Mas’ud, stating he would like to see a UN court set up.
Citing comments made by former South African president Nelson Mandela in 1997, Dr Swire – who lost his daughter Flora in the 1988 attack – said: “I can’t help remembering the words of Nelson Mandela, who told us in Edinburgh in 1997, ‘no one country should complainant, prosecutor and judge’.
“There are so many loose ends that hang from this dreadful case, largely emanating form America, that I think we should remember what Mandela said to the world and to us then and seek a court that is free of being beholden to any nation directly involved in the atrocity itself.”
He added: “I think it should not take place in America. I think now, in view of what we now know about how Scotland handled the case, it should not take place in Scotland.
“The obvious way forward it seems to me is to resort to the United Nations and invite them to provide a court with appropriate facilities to try this man and hopefully to review all the evidence that was used against the unfortunate Megrahi.”
Any trial, Dr Swire added, should also re-assess evidence in the case against al-Megrahi, who was released in 2009 after being diagnosed with terminal cancer and died in Libya in 2012.
A second suspect, Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, stood trial with al-Megrahi but was acquitted.
READ MORE: Holocaust denier does not consent to extradition, court hears
The former justice secretary also said he did not regret releasing al-Megrahi, saying: “I released Abdelbaset al-Megrahi because he adhered to the laws and guidance that we have in Scotland for people who do face a terminal illness and that’s something I stand by.
“People, no matter how culpable, are entitled, I think, to die. Their family haven’t committed any offence and they should be able to die with their family, but equally.
"Megrahi was never viewed as the bomber but he wasn’t viewed as some innocent abroad if I could put it that way. He had a role, he was no innocent who just happened to find himself in Malta.”
The former justice secretary said the attack was a “team effort” and not something that was carried out by one man.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article