SCOTLAND’S over-50s are among the most caring in the UK – because they put their families before having enough money, a new survey has revealed.
More than half of Britain’s 50 to 90-year-olds admitted that having enough money was more important to them than their health or spending time with their families.
But not in Scotland – where the majority of over-50s (60%) put their families first.
Financial stability came second – with 55% making it their most important concern – while 53% prioritised maintaining and improving their health and more than a third (37%) put enjoying their retirement at the top of their priority list.
The responses come from the LiveMore Barometer, a comprehensive survey of the priorities of more than 2000 of the UK’s 50 to 90-year-olds by LiveMore, the mortgage lender for the over-50s.
READ MORE: Barnardo's Scotland helps Ukrainians in Scotland feel at home
Those surveyed were asked to tick three of the most important priorities in their personal lives from a list which included financial stability/maintaining my standard of living, family life/spending more time with my family, maintaining/improving my health, enjoying retirement, helping family financially, holidays/travel, hobbies, personal development and work opportunities.
The responses also challenged the perception that Scottish parents are happy to run “the bank of mum and dad” – just a quarter of those surveyed put helping their families with money as their main concern. And even fewer (17%) prioritised holidays or hobbies (11%).
Those in the south east of England were most likely to put financial stability first, with 61% doing so. They were also the least likely to help family with money, with just 19% making it their top priority.
The findings also differed across age ranges – more 80 to 89-year-olds put family life above financial security and 70 to 79 -ear-olds made enjoying retirement their top priority.
“Financial institutions tend to make lots of assumptions about how older people think,” said LiveMore’s chief executive officer Leon Diamond.
“We want to have a proper understanding of their real needs – not just financially but in their wider lives, too. These responses show that there is no such thing as a “generic” over-50-year-old, both in terms of age or geography.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here