AN international human rights commissioner has urged the Government to consider withdrawing contentious legislation dealing with the legacy of the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
The Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic said the proposals raised serious issues over compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The convention enshrines the right for effective state investigations into deaths.
The council’s Committee of Ministers has also voiced concern about the Legacy Bill, which offers conditional immunity from prosecution for perpetrators of Troubles crimes who agree to provide information to a new truth recovery body, and a move to end conflict-related civil cases and inquests.
The bill is currently proceeding through its parliamentary stages at Westminster.
While the Government has made some amendments to the legislation, it has not dropped its most controversial aspects around immunity and halting civil and coronial cases.
The Council of Europe is an international body that oversees and monitors compliance with the ECHR. The UK is one of its 46 members and a signatory to the convention.
Commissioner Mijatovic said the UK government should consider withdrawing the Legacy Bill in view of the “widespread opposition” in Northern Ireland and its potential to contravene the convention.
“Any further steps on legacy must place the rights and needs of victims at its heart,” she said.
Meanwhile, the council’s Committee of Ministers expressed “growing concern” that the bill has not been formally paused or amended to “sufficiently allay the concerns” that the legislation will be in full compliance with the convention and will enable effective investigations.
Grainne Teggart, deputy director for Northern Ireland at Amnesty International UK, welcomed the stance adopted by the human rights body.
“Once again, the UK government finds itself isolated on the international stage,” she said.
“These are welcome and important calls which the UK Government must not ignore. Victims’ rights must be prioritised and the bill scrapped.
“This intervention adds to the cutting critique and overwhelming opposition facing the Troubles Bill.
“The UK Government’s determination to deprive victims and families of the justice they deserve while shielding the perpetrators who are responsible for murder, torture and other serious crimes makes a mockery of the rule of law and any claims by the UK Government that they respect human rights.
“Recent changes proposed by the Government are little more than a thinly veiled attempt to make the bill appear more just.
“We and victims are not buying it. The bill cannot be fixed, the right thing for the Government to do is scrap it.”
In response, a Northern Ireland Office spokesman said: “The Government is determined to deliver better outcomes for those most impacted by the Troubles while helping society to look forward.
“The legislation will not introduce an amnesty, and will not remove the prospect of criminal prosecutions.
READ MORE: 'About education as much as sales': Orange Order launches new coffee blend
“Conditional immunity will only be granted to individuals who cooperate fully and truthfully with the commission. Individuals who do not will remain liable to prosecution and will be referred to prosecutors should sufficient evidence exist.
“On November 23, the Government announced a number of proposed changes which seek to address key concerns that have been raised by many stakeholders, including victims and survivors and international partners.
“The Government remains absolutely committed to constructive engagement with all interested parties on their ongoing concerns, and how they might be addressed as the bill continues its passage through Parliament.
“However, we also recognise that a perfect solution to legacy issues is not attainable, and will continue to work towards the best practical solution.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel