A BACKLASH has erupted in Scotland after reports that King Charles is planning to hand the title of “Duchess of Edinburgh” to one of his grandchildren.
The monarch is said to be preparing to hand the title to Princess Charlotte, Prince William and Kate’s second child and the third person in line to the throne.
The plans have been branded “feudal patronage of the worst kind” by Edinburgh East MP Tommy Sheppard.
“Says it all that they take whatever titles they want, rather than asking the people who live here,” he added.
READ MORE: Anger over Prince Andrew's 'Earl of Inverness' title
The campaign group Our Republic also criticised the plans, but said they were “unsurprised by the monarchy's continued entitlement to claim ownership of cities at a whim and grant them to members of their family with no connection to them”.
Charlotte, along with her older brother George and younger brother Louis, were already granted new titles after the death of the Queen in September.
The three young royals became princes and princess of Wales after King Charles granted their father William (below) his former title over the nation.
The move led to a backlash from Welsh politicians, with Plaid Cymru leader Adam Price saying he did “not believe there is a role in modern, democratic Wales for the Prince of Wales”.
Gwynedd, the council area in Wales where Charles was handed his title of prince, saw its local politicians vote by 46 votes to four against William being given the title, and said it should be abolished altogether.
Referencing the Welsh backlash, Our Republic convener Tristan Gray said plans to name Charlotte the Duchess of Edinburgh was “just the latest of a long line of decisions made with open contempt for the people they claim to represent in their rule”.
He went on: “Gwynedd council was right to call for the abolition of the Prince of Wales title after a new prince was foisted on them without so much as an indication the people of Wales should have some say in who claims that title. A title steeped in history disregarded by this family…
“We would like to echo the response of [actor] Michael Sheen – there is more than one story in these isles, there is more than one tradition, there is more than one history. They deserve better than to be treated as yet another medal to be pinned, unearned, to the suits of whichever royal fancies them.
“We hope the City of Edinburgh follows suit, and makes clear that if there is to be a person given titles bearing the name of the city – that person should be elected by the people and accountable to them.”
Alba also criticised King Charles over the reported decision, saying people did not want a new Duchess amidst a cost-of-living crisis.
The party’s general secretary, Chris McEleny, said: “We are in the midst of a cost-of-living crisis. People across Scotland are facing a winter of getting themselves into heavy debt to pay for heating their homes and putting food on the table – making Scots face the absurdity of living fuel poor in an energy-rich nation.
“Meanwhile, Charles’ London government are refusing to accept that Scotland should be allowed to choose its own future and his Supreme Court has said our parliament doesn’t have the power to allow us to do so.
“That against this backdrop he thinks what the people of Scotland want, and need, is a new Duchess shows how completely out of touch this King is with the reality of life in Scotland.”
Buckingham Palace has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel