A SENIOR EU official has warned the Tories’ plans to tear up the Northern Ireland Protocol will lead to legal action from the bloc and intensify Britain’s economic misery.
In a stark warning David McAllister, chair of the EU’s foreign affairs committee, told The National that ditching the protocol – which allows for frictionless trade on the island of Ireland but is hated by Northern Irish Unionists – would crush the EU’s “trust” in the UK and could end up in court.
Speaking after a meeting MSPs, including the SNP’s party treasurer Colin Beattie, hosted by the British Chambers of Commerce and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Edinburgh, McAllister said: “As regards the challenges the UK is facing at the moment with inflation, energy prices and the difficult budget situation that under all circumstances, you should avoid further burdens, further difficulties, further challenges.
READ MORE: UK Government told to act after Scottish 'ghost firm' named in $500m FBI fraud probe
“This Northern Ireland Protocol Bill would, if it adopted by the UK Parliament, disapply core elements of the protocol and this would then mean real and significant consequences, including for the Trade and Co-operation Agreement.
“The EU would then need to carefully consider our options and this would mean also legal actions against the UK and we want to avoid this under all circumstances.
“We are not interested in making trade with the United Kingdom more complicated than it already is.
“That’s why I would always call on the UK Government, fully respecting their autonomy in decision-making; let’s find pragmatic and flexible solutions within the jointly agreed negotiation framework and that is the protocol.”
He said the protocol was too central to the terms on which Britain left the EU to be abandoned.
McAllister added: “And just to be very clear; the protocol is an integral part of the Withdrawal Agreement.
“Without a fixed solution to guarantee frictionless trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic, I’m not sure that the Withdrawal Agreement would have been concluded because this is a core element of negotiations.
READ MORE: Professor responds to 'pro-SNP' bias complaint upheld by BBC
“The EU was following three key principles: First, the protect the rights of EU citizens living in the UK and UK citizens living in the EU; the second was to defend and protect the integrity of our single market; and the third one was to avoid under all circumstances a hard border on the island of Ireland.
“This is affecting one of the three fundamental principles that led and guided the EU since the negotiations started in 2017.
“The protocol part of the solution of a problem. The problem has one name: Brexit.”
McAllister, the son of a Glaswegian who worked as a British civil servant in West Berlin, suggested the UK should aim to fix the problems with the protocol by the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement as a symbolic gesture.
And the Christian Democratic Union MEP added that despite indications of a “new attitude” from Prime Minister Rishi Sunak towards the EU, the UK was still failing to meet the terms of its Withdrawal Agreement with the bloc – warning this risked the country’s “credibility.
He added that there was no appetite whatsoever in Brussels for a “Swiss-style” deal with the UK – describing that arrangement as being the source of “challenges nearly on a daily basis”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel