THE choice for Scotland in a second independence referendum will be “much bigger” than the one faced in 2014, Professor John Curtice has said.
The British Polling Council president further said that the “long-term legacy” of the independence vote eight years ago was that while the No side won the ballot, the Yes side won the campaign.
Curtice said that this was evidenced by rising support for independence in the wake of the 2014 vote, hitting historic highs during the Covid pandemic in 2020.
He further said that polling showed “independence is now very much a younger person’s project”.
READ MORE: UK forecast for 'worst recession among top economies' due to Brexit and Tory policies
The politics professor was speaking at an event looking into Scotland’s Constitutional Future at Glasgow University. Organised by the UK in a Changing Europe research group, the event saw experts and academics discuss the issues facing Scotland and the UK, including currency, deficits, and borders.
Curtice told attendees that Scotland was evenly divided on the question of independence, adding: “If anyone tells you that they know what the outcome would be if there were to be a referendum tomorrow they are a fool because of course none of us know.”
He said that the independence debate had become closely intertwined with the Brexit debate, something which had not been the case in 2014.
Curtice told the conference: “Those of you who remember the 2014 referendum will remember that the politicians spent hours and hours arguing about whether or not an independent Scotland could or could not be a continued member of the European Union. They were wasting their breath.
READ MORE: Majority think Brexit has had a negative impact on the UK, poll finds
“There was no relationship in 2014 between people’s attitudes to the European Union and whether they voted Yes or No. There was no relationship between how people voted in 2014 and how people voted in 2016. But that has changed.
“Now, those people who would vote Remain are effectively three times more likely to be in favour of independence than those who voted Leave. The two issues have become intertwined, not only for politicians but also for the general public. And that reflects a crucial difference between the choice that Scotland would face if there were to be an independence referendum now and the choice that we faced in 2014.
“The choice now, certainly for those on the Yes side, is do you want to be inside the UK but outside the European Union, or do you want to be in the EU but outside the UK. That is a much bigger choice than the one that was faced in 2014.”
Speaking later at the same event, former SNP MP and current political practice professor Stephen Gethins said there was a “profound” choice between two unions being presented to the Scottish public.
“I wonder if we can have this kind of Brexit and this kind of Union as well,” Gethins said. “I wonder if thoughtful people who are pro-Union have fully taken into account the implications of that Brexit vote.”
Curtice also looked at polling on whether people wanted a second independence referendum. However, he said the issue of holding a second vote was largely just a proxy for the real debate.
“The debate about process is simply a surrogate for the debate about substance,” Curtice said, referencing how more than 90% of No voters do not want indyref2 while more than 90% of Yes voters do want it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel