A FORMER UK environment secretary said the Government's Australia trade deal “is not actually a very good deal for the UK”.
George Eustice, who was dismissed when Liz Truss became prime minister, warned that “unless we recognise the failures that the Department for International Trade made during the Australia negotiations, we won’t be able to learn the lessons for future negotiations”.
The first step, he said, is “to recognise that the Australia trade deal is not actually a very good deal for the UK”, adding: “It wasn’t for lack of trying on my part."
READ MORE: Foreign Secretary James Cleverly slammed after Qatar trip confirmed
Eustice went on to blame Truss for her a part in the deal, despite "holding all of the best cards".
He said the former prime minister and then trade secretary took the decision to set an "arbitrary target" to conclude heads of terms by the time of the G7 summit and "from that moment the UK was on the back foot repeatedly".
He continued: “In fact, at one point that then trade secretary asked her opposite number from Australia what he would need in order to be able to conclude an agreement by G7, and of course, the Australian negotiator very kindly set out the Australian terms, which then shaped eventually the deal.”
SNP international trade spokesperson Drew Hendry said: “These are awful deals, they’re unmitigated disasters and that is why they are refusing to allow Parliament to vote on them.
“These are the legacy of the previous prime minister and make as much sense as the infamous mini-Budget.”
The MP for Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey added: “These deals are bad policy at the worst possible time. The laissez-faire, couldn’t care, get it over the line Brexiteer ideology that has deprioritised domestic food production in support of importing cheaper for now, lower standard food is dangerous and should be put on hold immediately.
“It sets a thumpingly bad precedent. The rest of the world is watching and they want the same one-sided access that has been squandered here.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel