THE Scottish Parliament’s official Twitter account has been unofficially nominated for “tweet of the year” after it accidentally labelled a Tory MSP a “potato”.
Stephen Kerr, the Scottish Conservatives’ education spokesperson, was seemingly branded a “potato with more vitamin C than a lemon” in a perhaps unvetted post.
It meant to highlight how Kerr had brought forward a debate on gene-editing, but instead drew attention for all the wrong reasons.
Graphic design like this is why I can never quit Twitter https://t.co/7agJhLytgP
— Eve Livingston (@eve_rebecca) November 8, 2022
“Brutal but fair,” Modern Money Scotland’s Cameron Archibald tweeted.
“And there was me used to be a fan of tatties,” the SNP’s Rosa Zambonini quipped.
“Not sure Stephen Kerr will thank the Scottish Parliament for this new biography,” Scotsman journalist Conor Matchett wrote.
Others suggested that Twitter – which has come under fire following Elon Musk's takeover – may be worth sticking with after all.
The Tory MSP responded in good spirits. "I've been called worse!" he joked.
READ MORE: Warning of 'trucks rolling over Border' as England plans to legalise GM food
Kerr has put forward a motion, to be debated in Holyrood, on the topic of "gene editing".
Under EU law, with which Scotland aims to stay aligned, genetic editing is classified as a form of genetic modification and is outlawed.
However, post-Brexit the UK Government is aiming to legalise gene editing in England, and has called on the Scottish Government to follow suit.
Kerr called on the Parliament to recognise "that scientists at the James Hutton Institute in Dundee have reportedly predicted that gene-editing technology could result in potatoes with more vitamin C than lemons being grown, and considers that Scotland could be left behind England in food production due to Scottish legislation prohibiting the use of gene editing in Scotland".
Under the Tories' Internal Market Act, gene-edited foods produced in England can be sold in Scotland, and they will not have to be labelled.
Scottish Government environment minister Mairi McAllan previously said this should not be the case.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel