ALEX Salmond has called for an end to the “Cold War mentality” towards China after it was announced the Government may crack down on Confucius Institutes over fears they threaten “civil liberties” in the UK.
The Alba leader defended Confucius Institutes, claiming they were cultural exchanges, though the UK security agencies, the Government and expert observers believe they are used to control the behaviour, opinions and lives of Chinese students living in the UK.
It comes after security minister Tom Tugendhat told MPs on Tuesday the organisations “pose a threat to civil liberties in many universities in the United Kingdom”.
READ MORE: Experts say China’s use of ‘secret police stations’ no surprise
In 2021, we revealed how one former Chinese diplomat claimed the Chinese Communist Party was controlling students with student associations.
Confucius Institutes claim they exist to promote “understanding of contemporary China”.
The former first minister has accused opponents of the institutes of risking military confrontation with China.
He said: “The Scottish Government should defend these valuable cultural exchanges and oppose any attempts by the UK Government to close them down.
“We have nothing to fear from talking and exchanging culture. The real danger is from those who wish to divide the world into armed camps and who wish to shut Scotland out from the international community.”
There are Confucius Institutes in the University of Glasgow, Heriot Watt University, University of Aberdeen, University of Strathclyde and the University of Edinburgh.
Salmond, who severed his links with Vladimir Putin’s regime earlier this year following the invasion of Ukraine, is among a small number of people in UK politics calling for a close relationship with China.
Alyn Smith, the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson, told the Sunday National he had plans to further grill the UK government on its relationship with China after fears were raised last week a secret state police station was operating from a Chinese restaurant in Glasgow. The management denies the allegations.
READ MORE: Channel 4 accused of 'rigging' politics contest against pro-independence candidate
Chinese students are a cash cow for Scottish universities and extra valuable because of the capped number of Scottish students who are allowed to attend university in Scotland.
Former Glasgow University rector Aamer Anwar previously told The National higher education in Scotland had relied on Chinese students for “far too long”, adding that “without them, many universities would face financial ruin”.
Neale Hanvey, Alba’s Westminster leader, said: “Scotland’s educational links with China have long presented opportunities to increase trade and secure Chinese investment in industry and infrastructure.
“The Confucius programme helps promote Scotland’s innovative and creative sector through cultural exchanges and sporting links with China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
“These links also promote Scotland as a destination of choice for Chinese tourists - something which pre-pandemic delivered 172,000 visits to Scotland from China bringing £142 million into the Scottish economy.
“While the Confucius scheme invests £3m in Scotland to foster these bonds between our two countries, this modest investment has generated a fee income of £790m for our world-class Scottish universities.
“Westminster’s unilateral decision to block this programme takes no account of Scotland and China’s cultural links and will have a devastating impact on the entire Scottish higher education system.
“Westminster’s feud with China undermines and will deeply damage over a century of Sino-Scottish educational relations.”
A spokesperson for the Chinese Consulate in Edinburgh said: "Out of ideological bias and political expediency, some UK politicians deliberately undermined the cultural and educational exchanges and cooperation between China and the UK by discrediting Confucius Institutes.
"We urge them to abandon the Cold War zero-sum mentality, stop politicizing educational exchanges programs and stop undermining mutual trust and cooperation between China and the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel