ELON Musk plans to take on the role of chief executive at Twitter after completing his acquisition of the platform and will abolish permanent bans on users, it has been reported.
Musk will replace Parag Agrawal, who was one of several senior executives to be ousted as the takeover was completed, but may eventually cede the role in the longer term, according to a report from Bloomberg.
The Tesla boss also intends to get rid of permanent bans on user accounts because he does not believe in lifelong suspensions, the report said, meaning high-profile and polarising figures who had been previously banned, including former US president Donald Trump, would be allowed to return – but it remains unclear when this could happen.
Yesterday, Trump posted to his own Truth Social platform that he was “very happy Twitter is now in sane hands” but did not comment on any possible return, but instead praised his own app, which was launched after his Twitter ban.
READ MORE: Why this particular appeal of Twitter is in danger of being trashed by Elon Musk
Musk appeared to celebrate that his protracted takeover of the social media giant had been completed by tweeting shortly before 5am UK time yesterday “the bird is freed”, in reference to Twitter’s bird logo.
A US court had set yesterday’s deadline for the Tesla and SpaceX boss to complete his $44 billion (£38bn) acquisition of the platform.
Twitter has not yet published any further statement confirming the deal, but several senior figures and board members, including Bret Taylor, who had served as the company’s chairman, have changed their social media profiles to reflect that they no longer work for the company.
Many people have raised concerns over some of Musk’s proposals for a Twitter platform under his management, most notably his stance as a “free speech absolutist” who would allow any content which was not illegal to remain on the site.
This approach would likely clash with upcoming proposed regulation for the tech sector, including the UK’s Online Safety Bill, which will require the biggest platforms to not only remove illegal content, but also to take action against “legal but harmful” material that has been designated a priority and a threat to user safety.
Meanwhile, many users have threatened to quit Twitter if content moderation is loosened.
READ MORE: ‘It's time to step up’: UN pleas with billionaires amid food insecurity rise with Ukraine war
There have also been reports that many staff plan to leave the company in the wake of the takeover and some security campaigners have warned that Twitter could become an easy target for hackers in the aftermath of the deal and as Musk restructures the firm.
But the billionaire has already made some moves in an effort to calm these fears. On Thursday, he posted a statement aimed at Twitter’s advertisers where he said he was acquiring the platform because he believed it was important to have a space where “a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner”.
He added that “Twitter obviously cannot become a free-for-all hellscape, where anything can be said with no consequences”.
“In addition to adhering to the laws of the land, our platform must be warm and welcoming to all, where you can choose your desired experience according to your preferences,” he said.
Social media expert Matt Navarra said he was not surprised by the reports and said the reversal of permanent bans to allow “some of the most polarising, controversial, trouble-making accounts” back on to Twitter was the “most likely” big change to make early in Musk’s tenure.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel