FORMER Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry has claimed Suella Braverman committed “multiple breaches of the ministerial code” as Rishi Sunak faces a backlash over reinstating her as Home Secretary.
Braverman had admitted to a “technical infringement” of the rules as she was forced out prior to Liz Truss’s resignation.
In the Commons on Wednesday, the SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford called for Braverman to be sacked.
Berry, who left his role as party chairman on Tuesday, alleged there had been “multiple breaches” of the code, which sets out how members of the UK Government must behave.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at the price you can afford
Speaking on TalkTV’s Piers Morgan Uncensored, he said: “From my own knowledge, there were multiple breaches of the ministerial code.”
Braverman left her role in Truss’s cabinet after she was caught sending veteran backbench Tory Sir John Hayes an official document from a personal email account.
She accidentally copied in someone she believed to be Hayes’s wife but was in fact an aide to Conservative MP Andrew Percy, who subsequently raised the alarm.
"From my own knowledge, there were multiple breaches of the ministerial code."
— Piers Morgan Uncensored (@PiersUncensored) October 26, 2022
Sacked Conservatives chairman Jake Berry addresses Home Secretary Suella Braverman's alleged security breach.@jakeberry | @MrHarryCole | @KateEMcCann | @TalkTV | #PMU pic.twitter.com/GLDNi5mqi0
Braverman argued it was merely a draft written ministerial statement on immigration which had been due for publication imminently.
Allies said she sent it after going on a 4am immigration raid before coming clean about her “mistake”.
One source told the PA news agency that Braverman was “not expecting at all” to be sacked for what happened.
Berry continued: “It was sent from a private email address to another Member of Parliament. She then sought to copy in that individual’s wife and accidentally sent it to a staffer in Parliament.
“To me that seems a really serious breach, especially when it was documents relating to cybersecurity, as I believe.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak challenged over private schooling of daughters and Cabinet
“That seems a really serious breach. The Cabinet Secretary had his say at the time. I doubt he’s changed his mind in the last six days, but that’s a matter for the new Prime Minister.”
Braverman has said she “rapidly reported” her “mistake” through official channels, and informed Cabinet Secretary Simon Case as soon as she realised what had happened.
However, Berry added: “As I understand it, the evidence was put to her and she accepted the evidence, rather than the other way round.”
Blackford re-tweeted the clip, saying: "At PMQs, I said @RishiSunak should admit his mistake and sack Suella Braverman.
"Her position is untenable. If the Prime Minister keeps her in place to prop up his own position, he’ll send a message that sleazy Tory backroom deals are more important to him than integrity."
Labour have demanded that Case, who is reportedly “livid” over Braverman's swift return and “very concerned” about the breach, launch an investigation “into the extent of this and other possible security breaches”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel