ALBA have criticised the SNP’s “bitterly disappointing” decision to leave the House of Commons as one of their MPs began a speech about energy in Scotland.
Kenny MacAskill, a former Scottish justice secretary and SNP MP who defected to Alba in 2021, was to speak at Westminster about the Eastern Link undersea cable.
The £3.4 billion infrastructure project will enable the deployment of offshore wind energy in the North Sea, according to energy regulator Ofgem.
MacAskill was to praise the “sensible project” as “one that everyone should support”, before asking where the benefit lies for ordinary Scots.
READ MORE: National Grid warns of three-hour power cuts if energy crisis escalates
“But where’s the windfall for Scotland as a nation from this natural bounty?” he asked. “Where’s the wealth that should flow along with the energy from this vital resource?
“Where’s the benefit for those communities, such as my own in East Lothian, which will be able to see the turbines on their hills and off their shores.
“Scotland is energy rich, yet Scots are fuel poor.”
However, as deputy speaker Nigel Evans introduced the Alba MP, the SNP’s frontbench team stood up and walked out of the Chamber.
Key figures such as SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford, depute leader Kirsten Oswald, and shadow chancellor Alison Thewliss were seen standing up together and leaving the House.
Either this huge blunder is an incredibly poorly timed move, or it's a smack in the face to Scotland's cause and the unity of the broad and diverse Yes movement. SNP MP's need to remember that we sent them to Westminster to settle up, not to settle in. Country before Party. #YES pic.twitter.com/mAYU816Yot
— All Under One Banner (@AUOBNOW) October 26, 2022
Alba criticised the move, with a party spokesperson calling it “bitterly disappointing”.
They said: “As Westminster embarks on its latest robbery of Scotland’s natural resources you would think that all Scottish MPs would have filled the benches to take part in the debate.
“It is bitterly disappointing that despite sitting through speech after speech by those on the Government benches, they chose to walk out instead of taking part in a debate that actually matters to Scotland.”
Campaign group All Under One Banner also spoke out on Twitter. Sharing a video of the incident, AUOB wrote: “Either this huge blunder is an incredibly poorly timed move, or it's a smack in the face to Scotland's cause and the unity of the broad and diverse Yes movement.
“SNP MPs need to remember that we sent them to Westminster to settle up, not to settle in. Country before party,” the group posted.
The SNP have been approached for comment, however their most senior MP, Pete Wishart, has addressed the incident on Twitter.
Sharing images of tweets calling the MPs "bloody traitors" for having left the debate, Wishart wrote: "Just another night on Alba Twitter. This is just the last 24 hours…. But yet they ask ‘why won’t you stay and listen to us’?"
Responding to another user, Wishart added: "Even if we just set aside all the usual hate they dish on us it was an end of session 'adjournment debate' which usually involves only the member granted the debate and the replying Minister. No one attends them."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel