A CONTROVERSIAL US preacher is to be paid almost £100,000 in damages after a Glasgow venue cancelled his show.
Franklin Graham was due to appear at the OVO Hydro – then the SSE Hydro – in May 2020, but the event was cancelled amid mounting political pressure.
SNP council leader Susan Aitken had warned that how Graham “expresses his views could, I believe, fundamentally breach the council’s statutory equalities duties”.
And Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also lobbied for the event to be cancelled.
Now, a sheriff has ruled that the venue must pay the US preacher £97,325.32 due to breaching the Equality Act.
The money will cover the costs which the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) lost due to the event’s cancellation.
Graham described the ruling as a "clear victory for freedom of speech and religion in the UK".
He added: "This case was never about financial remedies - it was about the preservation of religious freedom in the UK."
A spokesperson for the Scottish Event Campus said: "We are naturally disappointed in the outcome of the case.
"We are currently reviewing the extensive documentation to determine whether any further action is required."
Venues in Sheffield and Liverpool also pulled out of hosting Graham's events.
Much of the anger towards Graham, son of the Rev Billy Graham, comes from past comments about gay rights, Islam, and his support for Donald Trump despite the President's adultery.
In 2016, he accused LGBT activists of “trying to cram down America’s throat the lie that homosexuality is OK”, and said anti-discrimination laws in the US would mean that “your children, and your grandchildren will be at risk to sexual predators and perverts”.
In 2019, he criticised US presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg for being a self-described gay Christian.
He stated that the Bible defines homosexuality as “something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicised.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel