THE Scottish Tories, lost for attack lines amid the omnishambles at Westminster, have launched yet another empty attack on the First Minister. Who could have guessed?!
Nicola Sturgeon is currently calling for a General Election, as the UK sees its third prime minister in seven weeks. She called it “preposterous democratically” for Rishi Sunak to now govern without an election.
It would seem pretty fair to give the people a say during this complete mess … but the Tories clearly don’t want to lose power as polls show Labour as far as 36 points ahead.
So as surveys show Douglas Ross’s party being totally wiped out north of the Border, they’re flailing around looking for any shaped stick to beat the SNP with.
Russell Findlay, a Tory MSP for the West Scotland region, branded the FM a “shameful hypocrite” for wanting an election – arguing that she herself did not call a vote after being made FM in the wake of Alex Salmond resigning.
He claimed that “for years” she governed “without ever attempting to call an election” … but failed to point out that just a few months after she became leader, the SNP won a record 56 out of 59 Scottish seats in the Westminster election. Just a year later she formed a minority government at Holyrood.
Findlay also failed to note the totally unprecedented state of having a PM last just 49 days in office, and predictions that the Tories are so widely disliked right now that they could be replaced as the official opposition by the SNP at Westminster. We are in totally uncharted waters here.
"Nicola Sturgeon must have realised this grubby political attack would backfire instantly,” he claimed. “It seems like this is just another attempt by the SNP to provoke grievance with the UK Government.”
In reality, it would be the Scottish Tories attack line which would “backfire”. With the majority of the public wanting an election, it's surely no surprise.
Ruth Davidson, whose relationship with democracy is now surely questionable given her seat in the House of Lords, went with a similar criticism to Findlay.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson does nothing about 'reforming House of Lords' in one year
She turned her fire on the Daily Record for attacking Sunak with a front page reading: “His own party rejected him a matter of weeks ago but as the only candidate who had the support of just 100 Conservative MPs, Rishi Sunak is set to become Britain’s new Prime Minister: Death of democracy.”
The former Scottish Tory chief tweeted: “There was no such front page in 2007 when Brown became PM without a vote (no GE til 2010) or in 2014 when Nicola Sturgeon became FM without a vote (no Scottish elex til 2016). It’s **almost** as if their pearl clutching sanctimony is actually partisanship.”
SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC was ready to take apart the Baroness’s argument.
“Perhaps that’s because their readership had actually voted for Gordon Brown & Nicola Sturgeon’s parties in considerable numbers & trusted them & didn’t fear their heartless policies?” the MP wrote back. “I think we all know who’s doing the pearl clutching here.”
“Ah yes, 3 PMs in 1 year is definitely pearl clutching, and definitely not a sign of a party and country in disarray,” added another commenter.
We can’t see this attack line sticking anytime soon. Want to go back to other smash hits, such as outrage over “detestgate” instead?
Mhairi Black (below), the SNP's shadow Scotland secretary, summed it up perfectly.
“While the public have been demanding a clean start with a General Election, Douglas Ross and his MPs have been running scared of democracy, rushing back in line to put party before country," she said.
“Rishi Sunak and his government cannot go on without a mandate from the people, it’s now incumbent on Tory MPs to do their democratic duty by demanding the Prime Minister calls a General Election.
“The situation is a democratic disgrace, one that shames the UK and makes a mockery of our democracy - this UK government’s position is untenable and cannot be allowed to limp on and impose a new wave of Tory austerity without any mandate."
That says it all.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel