THE MPs supporting Boris Johnson brought this on themselves. They really should have seen it coming.
When Johnson said he had never heard of allegations of sexual misconduct before handing Chris Pincher a whip’s role, he was telling fibs.
When he claimed his Brexit deal was “oven ready”, he was just sloganeering.
When he told Parliament that no Covid rules were broken in Whitehall under his watch, he was telling more than 100 lies at once.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak looks set to be prime minister as he wins key Brexiteers' backing
So when he came out and claimed he had 100 MPs backing him and he could run for prime minister if he wanted to, who believed him?
Well, some Tory MPs apparently did. And putting their trust in Johnson has left them all publicly humiliated a bit sooner than they might have expected.
James Duddridge, the Johnson loyalist to end all loyalists, wrote on Twitter after his boss announced he was dropping out: “Well that was unexpected. Off to bed!”
Well that was unexpected. Off to bed!
— James Duddridge MP (@JamesDuddridge) October 23, 2022
Obviously it wasn’t unexpected – but poor Duddridge doesn’t even seem to have been told about Johnson’s plans to drop out.
And embarrassingly for a man who imagines himself a big-hitter, Nadhim Zahawi doesn’t appear to have been told either.
The “former chancellor” – he held the post for two days before calling for Johnson to quit on Treasury-headed paper – had come out in support of his former boss.
He claimed “Boris 2.0” would be better in a couple of tweets, before fleshing it out into a full-length article for The Telegraph.
However, two literal minutes after that article was published (at 9pm), Johnson pulled out of the race (at 9.02pm). Poor Zahawi was no doubt on the blower to the Telegraph begging them to take down his article – something they obligingly did.
Unperturbed, the ambitious Tory MP pivoted at breakneck speed to support Rishi Sunak instead.
He wrote: “A day is a long time in politics… Given today's news, it's clear that we should turn to @RishiSunak to become our next Prime Minister. Rishi is immensely talented, will command a strong majority in the parliamentary Conservative Party, and will have my full support and loyalty.”
This is just embarrassing. Or to put another way here are my principles, if you don’t like them I can give you some more. https://t.co/uocMw0lYwo
— Ian Blackford 🇺🇦🏴 (@Ianblackford_MP) October 23, 2022
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said Zahawi’s rapid change of heart was “just embarrassing”.
“Or to put another way here are my principles, if you don’t like them I can give you some more,” he added.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, who had already embarrassed himself by claiming “Boris is a winner” and sharing a poll of him trailing behind Labour's Keir Starmer, was further left out in the cold by Johnson’s exit.
Rees-Mogg had previously shared a graphic claiming the UK’s choice was “Boris or bust”. It looks like it will be bust then, at least for Rees-Mogg’s ministerial career.
Told ya https://t.co/sDhWYdJP2g
— Brendan Clarke-Smith MP (@Bren4Bassetlaw) October 23, 2022
Brendan Clarke-Smith, another vocal and smug Johnson-backer, has gone silent on social media since an ill-advised “I told you so” he tweeted on Sunday afternoon to the news that Johnson’s team was once again claiming to have 100 MPs on side.
Attack dog Nadine Dorries was left raging at a "Banana Republic" in the UK and just about calling for a General Election again.
James Cleverly, the Foreign Secretary, has also put his tail between his legs and rounded to back Sunak – after coming out in support of Johnson on Sunday.
Embarrassing all round.
And they know it. One anonymous staffer working for an MP who had backed Johnson told Politico: “If I f***ing see him, he better hope he’s got a quick flight back to the Dominican Republic. What a complete and utter f***ing s*** to march people up like this and say to people ‘oh yeah, it’s definitely happening."
Perhaps this shower should have cast their minds back to July, when Johnson was forced out of office in ignominy, instead of forward to those big ministerial offices they no doubt had their eyes on.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel