THE UK risks experiencing levels of inequality last seen during the era of the Great Depression if the Tory government continues an austerity drive, a leading social expert has warned.
Danny Dorling, Halford Mackinder professor of geography at the University of Oxford, said a map of mortality rates he previously drew up showed in the 1930s there were “two Britains” which developed – one with high mortality rates and the other with much lower deaths.
He warned if the trend is beginning again and will be repeated if the UK Government “carries on as they have been doing since 2010”.
The warning comes in the wake of a major study carried out by researchers in Glasgow which concluded the economic policies of the Tories are likely to have caused more deaths than the Covid pandemic.
READ MORE: Glasgow food bank says rising number of people with mortgages and cars relying on service
Experts at Glasgow University and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health said their “not only shocking but shameful” statistics showed that almost 335,000 more deaths than expected were recorded across Scotland, England and Wales over an eight-year period.
Dorling (pictured), a social geographer who has written a series of books on inequality, said in the 1990s, he had published a Social Atlas of Britain which looked at historical mortality rates by area.
He told the Sunday National: “The thing that surprised me then is that in the 1930s there was a bimodal distribution, there was a large set of areas which had mortality 20% or 30% above the average.
“There were not that many areas which had average UK mortality and then there were a smaller set of areas with much lower mortality than average.
“So we had become so unequal by the 1930s with mass unemployment in particular areas that you had these kind of two Britains, if you like.”
Dorling said over the next few decades, there was an “enormous and rapid” equalisation that happened socially and economically, which was reflected in the “geography of mortality”.
But he said: “The worrying thing about the studies done by the Glasgow researchers and many others in the last 10 years, is that it is not just that life expectancy stopped rising after 2014.
“It was actually a fraction lower for the UK as a whole in 2018 than it was in 2014, which was quite remarkable – you don’t see that anywhere else in Europe.
“But underlying that, mortality rates went up the most in the most deprived groups and most deprived areas, and were actually still falling in the better off areas.
“So you are beginning to get the trend you need if you are going back to that 1930s pattern again.”
He added: “That’s just what the effect of a continuation of current trends would be and as yet we don’t have any evidence the trend isn’t continuing.”
Dorling suggested among the measures the UK Government could have introduced is bringing down the cost for energy needed to heat one or two rooms and provide for cooking, while increasing prices for any other additional needs.
READ MORE: 'My rent has doubled but my wages haven't': Scot struggles to keep up with rising prices
Without policies such as these, the country is “heading towards that 1930s difference between people,” he said.
Downing Street has claimed Liz Truss rejects austerity, but in her speech on Friday, she admitted public spending will be reduced. New Chancellor Jeremy Hunt said yesterday there was going to be some “very difficult decisions on both spending and tax”.
But Dorling added: “You began to see in the 1930s the starting of the thinking that this wasn’t right and you had to do something different amongst very well-off, posh, otherwise disinterested people.
“You could, if you are being optimistic, say you are seeing that in part of the Conservative Party just now, that just says you cannot take this any further. It is a question of whether we are at the beginning of that kind of sea-change.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel