A MAJORITY of Yes voters think there should be an elected head of state in an independent Scotland instead of the monarchy, according to new polling.
Research by YouGov has found of those who backed independence in the 2014 referendum, 31% think a king or queen should continue to reign after Scotland leaves the UK, while 54% believe there should be an alternative leader and 16% don’t know.
Since the Queen’s death senior figures in the SNP have underlined the party’s long held position of being in favour of retaining the monarchy, as outlined in the independence prospectus published ahead of the 2014 referendum.
The party has been urged to consider adopting a position of neutrality over whether to retain the monarchy in an independent Scotland.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at any price you can afford
And the survey suggests that a majority of SNP voters are not positive about keeping the monarchy.
When asked if Britain should continue to have a monarchy in the future, this was backed by 31% of those who voted SNP in the 2019 General Election.
However 51% were in favour of having an elected head of state instead, while 17% said they did not know.
On the position in an independent Scotland, nearly six in 10 SNP voters – 59% - said there should be an elected head of state, with 25% backing the continuation of the monarchy and 16% saying they did not know.
The poll of just more than 1000 people, which was carried out at the end of September following Queen Elizabeth’s death, found overall most Scots believe King Charles should continue in the future, with 50% backing the monarchy.
However just over a third – 34% - said Britain should have an elected head of state in the future, with 17% saying they did not know.
And the survey shows Scots are more divided on the issue of whether to keep the monarchy or not in an independent Scotland – with 41% saying having a king or queen on the throne should continue, while 40% think there should be an alternative when Scotland leaves the UK and 19% don’t know.
The YouGov report noted the royal family’s popularity in Scotland is currently dependent on support among the older generation.
READ MORE: Buckingham Palace reveals date of coronation of King Charles and crowning of Camilla
It said: “Scottish over-65s are far more likely to support a continuing monarchy in an independent Scotland, with 62% preferring a monarchy to an elected head of state – but 63% of those aged 16 to 24 would choose an elected leader.
“Likewise, fewer than one in ten 16 to 24-year-olds (9%) and less than a third of Scots aged 25 to 49 (28%) think the monarchy is good for Scotland.
“That’s in stark contrast to the 47% of 50 to 64-year-olds and the 57% of over-65s who feel the same.”
Younger Scots are also far less likely to think King Charles will perform well as the new monarch.
Just over a third of 16 to 24-year-olds – 34% - say he will do a good job, compared to three-quarters of those aged over 65.
Support for the late Queen was higher across all age groups, with 65% of 16 to 24-year-olds saying she did a good job during her time on the throne and 96% of over-65s agreeing with this statement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel