DOUGLAS Ross was accused of “making up” statements from the First Minister as the two clashed over the ongoing ferry debacle.
Speaking at FMQs on Thursday, the Scottish Tory leader said there was a “stench of political corruption” around the contract which saw Ferguson Marine – a shipyard formerly owned by Monaco-based billionaire Jim McColl – tasked with building two ferries.
In 2015, the Port Glasgow yard won a £97 million contract to build hull 801 (also known as the MV Glen Sannox) and hull 802. However, the budget has since skyrocketed to more than twice the original cost, with delay upon delay meaning the second ferry may be six years behind schedule.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross smirks and heckles as he's told of Tory damage to UK economy
A BBC report earlier in the week found that Ferguson Marine may have been given preferential treatment during the tendering process, leading Nicola Sturgeon to ask Audit Scotland to “look at the substance of the allegations”.
Highlighting the issue at FMQs, Scottish Tory leader Ross (below) suggested that the contract had been awarded to Ferguson Marine because it had been “owned by an SNP government economic adviser and a prominent independence supporter”.
He went on: “[Sturgeon’s] government agreed a deal for the ferries without agreeing a design for the ships. Her government ignored experts who advised not to go ahead with the deal. Her government waived a refund guarantee that is a mandatory requirement on these kind of contracts, and now it appears that the whole deal was rigged.
“The Government seems to have given special treatment to a political adviser and ally and there is a stench of political corruption.
“Just what happened to the First Minister who used to have a monthly photocall at Ferguson Shipyard. The First Minister who used to pose for pictures at the yard and shout it from the rooftops that it was one of her proudest achievements?”
In response, Sturgeon (below) said that Ross had been “reduced to simply standing up and making up things that I’ve said”.
“I will never apologise for actions that this government has taken to save the jobs of the people who work in Ferguson’s Shipyard,” she added.
With the two ferries already over budget and behind schedule, the Scottish Government was forced to nationalise the shipyard in 2019 to save the some 350 jobs of workers at the site.
The First Minister further said that the Scottish Tory boss should “make his mind up on what his allegations actually are”.
She went on: “For months now Douglas Ross appears to have alleged, in this chamber and elsewhere – wrongly I hasten to add – that Scottish ministers directed, forced CMAL to award this contract to Ferguson Shipyard.
READ MORE: Liz Truss 'may have aimed for economic crisis to prepare NHS for privatisation'
“Today, it appears to be the case that Douglas Ross is alleging that CMAL in some way collaborated with Ferguson to ensure that contract went to that shipyard. So perhaps Douglas Ross just needs to get a little bit of clarity about the allegations he is making.”
However, CMAL – a public corporation of the Scottish Government which owns and manages ferries and other assets – was not implicated in the allegations of a document handed to Ferguson Marine which Ross described as a “424-page cheat sheet on how to build ferries”.
Acknowledging this, Sturgeon said: “As I understand it there is no suggestion at all that it was CMAL that passed that document to Fergusons. In fact I think the BBC suggested that was a design consultant.”
The First Minister turned the tables on the Tory leader at the end of the clash, asking why he had demanded she follow tax cuts for the wealthy, brought in by the UK Government, which have led to the collapse of the value of the pound.
“I’m not sure Conservative Douglas Ross is on very strong ground at all today in talking about government disasters,” she said.
Sturgeon highlighted how the Tories had demanded “that I match Tory tax cuts for the richest people in our society”, going on: “Tax cuts that have already sunk the pound, crashed the mortgage market, brought people’s pensions to the brink of collapse, forced the Bank of England into an emergency bailout, tax cuts that will force deep reductions in public spending.
“I think people might have wanted to hear Douglas Ross today explain why he thinks the Scottish Government should emulate these policies.”
READ MORE: One CalMac ferry delayed again as yard estimates final cost to taxpayer
Ross also raised a letter, sent by Ferguson Marine to Holyrood transport committee chair Edward Mountain on Wednesday, which outlined the total expected costs for the two ferries.
In the letter, the shipyard said costs for the first ferry, hull 801, are not expected to exceed £101m, while the 802 should not cost more than £108.6m – for a total of £209.6m.
This is lower than Audit Scotland’s predicted total cost of the project, forecast in March this year, of “at least £240m”, but £112.6m higher than the initial £97m fixed price contract awarded to CalMac.
Furthermore, the second 802 hull was pushed back into 2024, meaning it will be six years late on delivery, while 801 was said to be expected to be delivered before May 2023.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel