LIZ Truss will, barring any major constitutional upsets, become the prime minister tomorrow, the climax of an impressive rise from obscurity to the highest elected office in the UK.
If you’d asked more casual observers of politics if they had heard of Truss last year, you would likely have been met with a no. Some anoraks might have pointed to a famous clip of her hailing a trip to China, where she gave a frankly bizarre level of enthusiasm for opening up “new pork markets in Beijing”.
This notorious clip was her biggest claim to fame in the popular consciousness.
It was funny, undoubtedly, and the stilted performance made her seem like an unserious political actor, with most writing off her prospects as a big hitter. More fool them.
READ MORE: Is Liz Truss god's gift to the Scottish independence cause?
But could Truss’s porcine pronouncement portend poorly for those wanting the Conservatives out at the next General Election?
Just been pigging out on pork belly from Sargeant's, where the meat is slaughtered on the premises. Makes a huge difference.
— Liz Truss (@trussliz) January 17, 2010
The Jouker has dug into the links between Tory electoral success and a passion for pork.
David Cameron
Call-me-Dave mastered a new, friendly image for the Conservatives while leader of the opposition and was just sufficient to propel him into the top job.
Shortly after the 2015 election, where the party managed a 12-seat majority, an MP purporting to be a former classmate of Cameron’s made outrageous claims about a pig and the PM.
He claimed in an unauthorised biography of the prime minister, that he had been involved in a grim initiation ceremony for the Piers Gaveston Society at Oxford University.
READ MORE: Five reasons why PM Liz Truss makes independence more necessary than ever
The Conservatives’ showing in the next election showed the announcement did not take too much of a hit, with the party losing control of only one council.
Pig score: 9/10. Election score: 6/10.
Theresa May
The Maybot ran on near-weekly defeats in the Commons and so had no use for pork or any other foodstuffs. The Jouker can find no evidence of May ever expressing any particular enthusiasm for bacon, sausages or chops.
Theresa May lost the Conservatives’ majority in the 2017 election, in response to an insurgent Labour Party, then led by vegetarian Jeremy Corbyn – who was put off animals entirely by working on a Jamaican pig farm back in the olden days.
Pig score: 0/10. Election score: 2/10
Boris Johnson
Big Dog was one of the MPs who were forced to deny being the source of the Cameron anecdote.
Johnson came out swinging in the 2019 election, winning the Tories a thumping majority that got Brexit done, to coin a phrase. But was a swine swing at play?
Johnson was dubbed the “greased piglet” by Cameron, a title which only continued to prove its aptness until his luck finally ran out over the Chris Pincher scandal earlier this year.
In November 2021, the outgoing PM lost his place in a speech and adlibbed, raving about a a recent visit to Peppa Pig World, in Hampshire, which he said was "very much my kind of place".
Media coverage of the incident failed to embarrass boosterish Boris and he even survived a rumoured “pork pie plot” in January 2022. Readers will note it was six months later he announced his resignation.
Pig score: 8/10. Election score: 9/10.
Swiners and losers?
In broad-brush stroke analysis, The Jouker’s research seems to indicate a fairly strong correlation between professed porcine passion and electoral success for Tory PMs.
Of course, our methodology is far from exact and if we’re going to mix metaphors, the conclusions are probably bullsh*t.
But we’re just trying to make some sense of this utter madness, just like you are.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel