ANDY Burnham has responded to Nicola Sturgeon after she questioned his claim that he was not invited to meet her during his visit to Scotland.
Confusion arose after an article in the Sunday Mail quoted Burnham complaining that he had not been invited to see Sturgeon during his visit to Scotland this month – despite the pair meeting on Wednesday in St Andrew’s house.
Burnham said: "I asked to meet but I got no response and I think that's a shame."
Upon seeing the article, Sturgeon tweeted: “Interesting interview with Andy Burnham in today’s Sunday Mail. I was a bit perplexed by this part of it tho - Andy and I met on Wednesday afternoon in St Andrew’s House and had a constructive discussion about a range of issues.”
Interesting interview with Andy Burnham in today’s @Sunday_Mail - https://t.co/tdgx3rA5qF
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) August 28, 2022
I was a bit perplexed by this part of it tho - Andy and I met on Wednesday afternoon in St Andrew’s House and had a constructive discussion about a range of issues. pic.twitter.com/u2iMe7N51T
And Burnham has now responded saying that the interview had occurred before the meeting had been confirmed.
He wrote: “We certainly did Nicola - it was good to see you. This interview took place before the meeting had been confirmed.”
There had been speculation over whether the two would meet this month after Burnham accused the SNP of treating the north of England “with contempt” in relation to a travel ban on Scots going to Manchester during lockdown.
READ MORE: Alun Davies slams Scottish Labour's 'failures' in message to UK part
At the time of the ban, the area had the highest proportion of people likely to test positive for coronavirus of any region in the country. Despite this, Burnham said the decision was not proportionate and accused the Scottish Government of “hypocrisy”.
At a Fringe event this month, Burnham claimed that a request to meet the First Minister had been ignored – something the Scottish Government said was “inaccurate” as they had responded on the same day to agree on an agenda and identify dates.
The pair eventually met on Wednesday, August 24.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel