A COALITION of campaign groups, including one focused on the Scottish Highlands and Islands, has announced plans to sue Ofgem over the energy price cap rise.
On Friday, the UK energy regulator said that the energy price cap would go up by 80% from £1971 to £3549 from October 1. For people on prepayment meters – who tend to be some of the most vulnerable in society – the average spend will go up from £2017 to £3608.
The price cap is then expected to go up again from January 1 to more than £5300, according to money saving expert Martin Lewis.
READ MORE: Martin Lewis issues dire warning as Ofgem raises energy price cap by 80 per cent
The Highlands and Islands Affordable Homes Warmth Group, in conjunction with Good Law Project and Fuel Poverty Action, has announced plans to sue Ofgem over what they call a “failure to mitigate the impact of rising energy bills on consumers”.
Jo Maugham, the director of Good Law Project, said: “The announcement today will devastate families. Just who and what is Ofgem for? Do not be fooled. This is a choice. And the choice they’ve made is to let low-income consumers and small businesses bear the brunt of this crisis.
"We believe Ofgem can – and should – do more. We intend to put the question before the High Court, and will ask for a fast-tracked timeline to reflect the urgency of this crisis.”
The campaigners said they plan tol ask the High Court to ensure the regulator ”upholds its legal duties to, among other things, carry out an impact assessment before confirming the price cap increase, including assessing the disproportionate impact on elderly people, children and people with disabilities”.
Good Law Project argued that Ofgem is legally required to provide evidence it has carried out a proper impact assessment and consider appropriate mitigation measures for the most vulnerable before raising the price cap.
In July, the campaign group wrote to Ofgem asking it to provide proof of its impact assessments. It said the regulator failed to do so.
Ofgem’s chief executive Jonathan Brearley warned of the hardship energy prices will cause this winter and urged the incoming Prime Minister and new Cabinet “to provide an additional and urgent response to continued surging energy prices”.
The regulator said the increase reflected the continued rise in global wholesale gas prices, which began to surge as the world unlocked from the Covid pandemic, and had been driven still higher to record levels by Russia slowly switching off gas supplies to Europe.
Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi said the increase in the energy price cap would cause “stress and anxiety” for people, but that the Government was working to develop more options to support households.
However, no immediate extra help will be announced by Boris Johnson’s Government, with major financial decisions being postponed until either Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak is in No 10 after the Tory leadership contest.
An Ofgem spokesperson said: “Ofgem’s priority is to protect consumers and we know that people are currently under huge pressure as bills continue to rise. We will keep working closely with the Government, consumer groups and with energy companies on what further support can be provided to help with these higher prices.
“We can confirm that Ofgem has received a letter from the Good Law Project and we will reply in due course.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here