A MAN accused of sending threatening messages to First Minister Nicola Sturgeon on social media and of abducting a sheriff should be barred from representing himself in legal proceedings, a court has heard.
William Curtis and another man with whom he is accused of the incident involving the sheriff both previously said they do not want legal representation and maintained that position when they appeared at the High Court in Edinburgh on Wednesday.
However, Advocate Depute Chris McKenna said it would not be appropriate for the men to represent themselves due to the involvement of two vulnerable witnesses in the case.
He said it would not be suitable for the men to cross-examine vulnerable witnesses and asked the court to prohibit them from conducting their defence, and for lawyers to be appointed for them.
McKenna said: “It’s the Crown submission that it would be manifestly inappropriate for either accused to be given the opportunity to cross-examine either of these witnesses.”
READ MORE: Two arrests after vandalism at historic Dunfermline Abbey
He said that while the vulnerable witnesses do not relate to the sole charge involving Philip Mitchell, there would be nothing to stop him from questioning them.
He told the judge Lord Weir: “It is a balancing act between the fairness we must give to the accused and the best interests of the vulnerable witnesses.”
He added: “It cannot be said that the court appointment of legally-qualified representatives would risk prejudicing justice, far from it.”
Curtis, 69, is accused of behaving in a threatening or abusive manner which was “likely to cause a reasonable person to suffer fear or alarm” by sending emails and posting messages on social media in which he made threatening remarks towards Sturgeon on various occasions between February 27 and March 6, 2019.
He is further accused of allegedly sending or causing a message to be sent through social media on March 9, 2019 to Stewart Stevenson MSP which threatened him and contained a link to a video relating to the murder of the MP Jo Cox.
He also faces two other charges of posting messages of a “threatening and abusive nature” on social media in October 2020 and June 2021.
Curtis and Philip Mitchell, 60, are accused of assaulting and abducting a sheriff in a car park in Banff, Aberdeenshire, on June 29, 2021.
It is alleged they seized Robert McDonald, sheriff of Grampian, Highlands and Islands, at Banff, pulled him to the ground, sat on top of him and detained him there against his will.
All the alleged offences happened in Aberdeenshire.
READ MORE: Kirsty Strickland: Should Margaret Ferrier be sent to jail for breaching Covid rules?
Curtis has pleaded not guilty to the charges while Mitchell has not yet entered a plea.
At the hearing in Edinburgh on Wednesday, Curtis said he would continue to represent himself.
He said: “There’s not a barrister in the country would touch me because they are not good enough. I will continue to defend myself.”
Lord Weir said he would consider the matter of legal representation before issuing a written decision.
He adjourned the case until September 8.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article