RUTH Davidson has done nothing about “reforming the House of Lords into a democratic chamber” since becoming a Baroness, despite claiming it was one of her top priorities on entering the upper House, The National can reveal.
The former Scottish Tory leader accepted a life peerage from Boris Johnson’s government, officially being sworn in as a member of the Lords in July 2021. She took the name “Baroness Davidson of Lundin Links”.
Before the swearing-in ceremony, Davidson claimed that she would be focused on "reforming the House of Lords into a democratic chamber". She listed this aim as one of her three areas of particular interest, alongside assisted dying and gambling reform.
However, in the roughly 13 months since Davidson joined the Lords, she does not appear to have mentioned reforming the Lords even once.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson's register of outside interests published by House of Lords
The SNP's most senior MP, Pete Wishart, told The National that everyone who accepts a peerage claims they "intend to reform – the sad truth is that none ever do".
Davidson has spoken a total of six times in the chamber, according to the official Hansard record.
One of those contributions, in December 2021, focused largely on Scotland’s economic contribution to the Union and vice versa.
During the speech, she said: “Too often I feel that those of us who support the continuation of our United Kingdom are at risk of doing the Scottish nationalists’ job for them … they define the United Kingdom as some kind of imposition, something that is done to Scotland.”
The Baroness has also spoken twice about assisted dying, once about clinical negligence, and twice about the UK’s defence capabilities.
Outside of the House of Lords, she has also taken action on her other priority – gambling reform. She wrote an article on the issue for The Telegraph and signed a letter to the Prime Minister calling for “bold” action.
However, she has not so much as tweeted about the House of Lords, let alone reforming it, since 2018.
SNP MP Wishart told The National that Davidson had “absolutely no intention” of reforming the upper House.
He said: “I think we all remember Ruth Davidson’s pledge that she would reform the Lords from within the confines of its ermine laden upholstery but more than a year on it remains as undemocratic and bizarre as ever.
“There have been no great speeches lambasting its undemocratic nature or even the slightest musings on the current bloated condition of this national embarrassment.
“Ruth Davidson had absolutely no intention of reform as she fits neatly into the current membership of political has-beens, donors, and cronies. On accepting a peerage all say they intend to reform – the sad truth is that none ever do.”
A spokesperson for the Baroness said: "As Ruth has said many times, she is prepared to work with anyone, from any side of the chamber, on meaningful reform."
READ NEXT: Boris Johnson under fire for 'stuffing House of Lords full of peers'
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel