THE UK Government has paused international aid payments other than in exceptional circumstances, it is understood, in a move experts say is likely to cost lives.
The Foreign Office has said it is “prioritising essential overseas aid funding” in light of a report in Bloomberg which claims all spending on projects not deemed critical to life or where a pause in payments would lead to higher costs later has been stopped.
The National has been told “departments have temporarily paused non-essential aid spending” because of extra costs associated with the Ukraine crisis and the Afghan resettlement scheme.
Sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told Bloomberg that the Foreign Office has severely cut back on its overseas development budget, blaming additional pressures caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
READ MORE: Independent Scotland 'would double UK's slashed international aid allocation'
Any payments above £1 million are barred unless they are going to projects deemed “critical to life”, the site reports, or unless pausing the payments would lead to extra costs down the line.
One source who spoke to Bloomberg also said that new contracts and activity linked to projects yet to start were also being paused.
Cutting overseas development funds would “almost certainly” cost lives, said the SNP’s international development spokesperson Chris Law.
He told The National: “The question really is: ‘What do you mean by non-critical?’
“Because lots of the things that have already been cut have cost lives.”
The new spending restrictions are in place until the new prime minister is installed on September 6, the site reports.
The move would deliver fresh pain to those reliant on UK cash for international projects after the overseas development budget was slashed from 0.7% of gross national income to 0.5%.
Law has called for the budget to be restored to its pre-pandemic level as well as criticising the decision to merge the former Department for International Development, formed in 1997, with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 2020.
READ MORE: Michael Gove confronted over Brexit 'lies' at airport by passenger suffering 30-hour delay
Liz Truss is currently leading former chancellor Rishi Sunak, who pushed through the cut in response to the Covid pandemic, despite warnings the move would risk the futures of children and vulnerable people globally.
Action Against Hunger, a global humanitarian organisation, said in 2021 the decision to slash the aid budget put “more children’s lives at risk”.
At a debate on the Government’s international development strategy last month, Law said there was “no mention” of plans to improve food or nutrition programmes.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The Government is currently prioritising essential overseas aid funding such as providing humanitarian support to the people of Ukraine.
“The UK has a long history of helping others in their hour of need and we are one of the largest aid spenders globally, above the OECD average.
“We remain committed to spending 0.5% of our gross national income on overseas aid and will return to 0.7% when the fiscal situation allows.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel