TORY infighting in the party’s leadership contest continues to grow, with Ben Wallace now accusing Rishi Sunak of trying to block “vital” defence money during his time as chancellor.
In a series of interviews, the Defence Secretary added to the blue-on-blue attacks as he explained the reasons behind his support for Liz Truss, while taking thinly veiled swipes at Sunak’s record in the Treasury.
Wallace told Sky News the Foreign Secretary recognises that “the threats we face every day” need to be “funded properly”, pointing to Truss’ commitment to increase defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2030.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak gives bizarre take on Boris Johnson's Scottish legacy
He also said that "without any prompting or asking", Truss wrote a letter to the Prime Minister saying that defence needs more money.
In stark contrast, Sunak, the Defence Secretary said, tried to block “vital” defence money in 2019, only to find himself over-ruled by the Prime Minister.
He was asked by LBC’s Nick Ferrari how obstructive the former chancellor was in granting more cash to the armed forces.
Wallace replied: “I don’t think he was obstructive…”
When pressed further, the Defence Secretary said: “I mean, the multi-year settlement that we got was not what the Treasury had wanted.
“They wanted a one-year settlement. This was back in 2019, I think. And it was vital that we got a multi-year settlement.
“And the Prime Minister effectively asserted his authority and made sure that’s what happened.”
READ MORE: We need fresh thinking – not a reboot of Thatcherism by Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss
Ferrari asked: “But Sunak was not in support?”
Wallace said: “Not that I remember.”
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, the Defence Secretary insisted Sunak would be a “fine member of anybody’s Cabinet”, but added: “For me, Liz is the one that I think will do best by defence of this nation, by investing in it.”
He went on: “When I was in Government, without any prompting or asking, Liz, I remember, wrote a letter to the Prime Minister saying that defence needs more money, it’s a more dangerous, risky world.
“She did that off her own back. She’s been very consistent.”
The Defence Secretary, who would have not liked the Prime Minister to resign, was also critical of the way the former chancellor resigned, telling Sky News: “I just don’t think triggering Cabinet ministers walking out at a time of a crisis is the right course of action.
“There were other mechanisms to do what they wanted. If Rishi Sunak didn’t want the Prime Minister to be Prime Minister, there are other mechanism to do that. And that goes for all the other ministers.”
Wallace’s endorsement is seen as a major and further boost for the Foreign Secretary, who has come out ahead in polls and surveys of Tory party members.
Speaking to The Sun on Wednesday, Wallace described the Foreign Secretary as “authentic, honest and experienced” with the “integrity” for the top job.
He also wrote in The Times that Truss was “a winner not because she’s a slick salesperson, but because she is authentic”.
The Cabinet heavyweight’s backing came after the two Tory leadership hopefuls were quizzed separately on a vast array of policy areas – as well as their predictions for the Women’s Euro 2022 final.
The event, hosted by LBC’s Nick Ferrari, was the first of 12 sessions for the party faithful across the country to question the final two contenders, before voting for the next Tory leader and prime minister closes on September 2.
While they did not address one another directly, tax continued to be a significant dividing line between the pair.
Sunak said he would not “embark on a spree, borrowing tens and tens of billions of pounds of unfunded promises and put them on the country’s credit card”.
Meanwhile, Truss criticised windfall taxes – something Sunak imposed as a one-off on energy companies as chancellor.
She said: “I don’t believe in windfall taxes, because they put off future investment.
“What we should be doing is encouraging Shell and other companies to invest in the United Kingdom, because we need to get our productivity up, we need capital investment.”
The former chancellor acknowledged he was trailing Truss in the polls, but vowed to fight for every vote.
He said: “We are going to have to appeal to swing voters in every part of our country. And I believe with all my heart that I am the person, I am the candidate, that gives our party the best opportunity to secure that victory.”
He later denied that his pledge to cut VAT on energy bills was a U-turn, saying “it’s reasonable that there is more than we can do”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel