PRITI Patel – one of Boris Johnson’s most fierce loyalists – has told the Prime Minister it is time for him to step down.
The Home Secretary relayed the feelings of the majority of the Conservative Party’s MPs to Johnson – namely that the confidence in him has evaporated.
By 7:30pm on Wednesday evening, Boris Johnson had lost 38 members of his government in just more than 24 hours.
The slew of resignation letters – which was accompanied by a separate reported mountain of no confidence letters sent to the backbench 1922 Committee – represented a record number in British political history.
READ MORE: Excruciating MP meeting sees Boris Johnson 'threaten snap General Election'
Michael Gove, Simon Hart – the Welsh Secretary, and the chief whip Chris Heaton-Harris are among key Johnson allies who are believed to have told the Prime Minister to step down but have not proffered resignations of their own.
Patel is now confirmed to have become a member of the rebel group, despite her close relationship with Johnson.
The Prime Minister lost his first ethics advisor, Alex Allan, after he sided with Patel despite his conclusions that her behaviour had amounted to bullying of staff.
However, reports say that Johnson is refusing to step down, instead insisting he has a mandate from the 2019 General Election to lead the country.
If Johnson is staunch in his refusal to leave, the 1922 Committee is likely to seek a change in the rules which block a second vote of no confidence within twelve months of a first.
The rule change may come in as soon as next week, meaning Johnson could be forced out within days even if he refuses to resign.
When Johnson won a no-confidence vote in his leadership in June, it was by a margin of 211 to 148. Assuming the 38 government resignations supported him in that vote, the numbers will now have switched.
If another no-confidence vote were held right now, Johnson would be likely to lose by at least 186 votes to 173.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel