SEVERAL SNP MSPs have challenged Priti Patel to financially compensate miners who were pardoned of unjust convictions during the 1984-85 Miners’ Strike.
In an open letter to the Home Secretary, the MSPs argue that the compensation should be drawn from the £4.4 billion which the Treasury has siphoned as a surplus from the Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme since the privatisation of British Coal in 1994 – equivalent to almost half a million pounds per day for 28 years.
Speaking on behalf of the signatories, SNP MSP Fulton MacGregor commented: “These pardons right a historic wrong and represent an important official acknowledgement of the injustice inflicted on these miners and their families.
READ MORE: Miners’ Strike Pardon Bill passes but financial compensation push fails
“And while pardons will help remove the stigma of criminality and restore dignity to those convicted, there remains the outstanding need to compensate those wrongly convicted.”
MacGregor added that given the role played by the UK Government under Margaret Thatcher, responsibility lies with the current UK Government and Patel, who MacGregor said “has a moral and financial obligation to do the right thing and give these families no less than they deserve.”
MacGregor continued: “Instead of the Treasury continuing to raid the miners’ pension scheme, they should fund appropriate compensation for pardoned miners from the very fund they would have received pensions from had they not been unjustly convicted.”
READ MORE: Does film about Scots miners tell real story of the General Strike?
This follows the passage of legislation in Holyrood earlier this month, which saw Scotland become the first country in the UK to pardon formers miners. However, the Scottish Government faced criticism from Scottish Labour after the combined votes of the SNP, Greens and Tories defeated Labour amendments which would have delivered financial compensation.
Justice Secretary Keith Brown argued that while he “didn’t disagree on the principle of compensation”, he would seek to discuss the matter with the Home Secretary, rather than offering compensation unilaterally.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel