LIZ Truss has rejected suggestions from Boris Johnson’s allies that an inquiry into whether he lied to Parliament over partygate risks becoming a “kangaroo court”.
The Foreign Secretary said on Thursday that she “implicitly” trusts the Privileges Committee to investigate the Prime Minister and defended the decision for Labour grandee Harriet Harman to chair it.
The Commons inquiry that could determine Johnson’s fate in office began on Wednesday with a decision to allow Downing Street staff to give evidence anonymously if necessary.
Harman was elected to lead the cross-party committee, which is expected to begin holding oral evidence sessions in the autumn.
The Daily Telegraph reported Downing Street sources accusing the committee of relying on “hearsay evidence” by considering allowing witnesses anonymity.
And they questioned Harman, a former acting Labour leader, leading the committee.
But Truss told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I trust implicitly my parliamentary colleagues to listen properly to the evidence and make the right decision.”
She told Sky News that “I don’t see a problem” with Harman chairing the committee and rejected the sources’ claims that it is going to be a kangaroo court.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford hits back as Raab declares it's 'good to see him in his place'
“No, we have these processes in Parliament. The process has kicked off, we now need to wait for the results,” she said.
The committee gave a month for witnesses to come forward after launching their investigation in a private meeting on Wednesday.
Johnson survived a vote of no confidence by Tory MPs earlier this month in the wake of Sue Gray’s damning inquiry into partygate.
But 148 Conservatives – or 41% of his party – voted against Johnson, in what was a major blow to his authority.
Under the current rules of the Conservative 1922 Committee, the Prime Minister cannot face another vote over his leadership for a year.
However, the group of backbench MPs could work to change this if they believe any events change the situation and that he should go.
Some Conservatives have said they believe Johnson being found to have lied to the House, normally considered a resigning matter, would cross that line.
The committee is comprised of seven MPs, four Tories, two from Labour and one from the SNP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel