A LABOUR councillor has used a public meeting to air out her grievances within the party, including the revelation that none of her colleagues had received the final partnership agreement between Labour, LibDems and independents in South Lanarkshire.
The unofficial coalition between Labour, Tories, LibDem and independent councillors last month was described as “a sad day for democracy” by minister and Clydesdale MSP Màiri McAllan. The council voted to confirm Labour as the minority administration despite the SNP winning the most seats and most votes.
Instead, Labour won the support of the Tory group, who had seven seats, and the LibDems in order to form their own administration.
Councillor Monique MacAdams used the second meeting of the new administration on Wednesday to request a copy of the agreement propping up the administration, which was announced a month ago, and ask whether internal group documents were legally binding.
When asking the Labour Provost councillor Margaret Cooper to see the final document, the East Kilbride West councillor said: “The Labour group had been sent a copy of the draft partnership agreement that was between the LibDems, Labour and the independents but we’ve never received the final document that was signed, could that be provided to everybody, please?"
READ MORE: Scotland's local councils: Who is in control?
Cooper replied: “That’s a political matter Councillor McAdam, and I’ll refer that to Councillor Brown, Councillor Fagan and myself for later discussion and we’ll get back to you on that."
The South Lanarkshire SNP group reacted to the embarrassing public moment.
They said: “A Labour councillor used the meeting to publicly ask for a copy of the 'partnership agreement' that's propping up their coalition administration. It appears Labour's calls for openness and transparency don’t even apply within their own group. What chance does the public have at knowing what’s going on?"
The SNP asked that the final agreement be supplied to all councillors as members of the public are rightfully frustrated at the nature of this administration.
Later in the meeting, MacAdams asked several times whether her lack of consent to be on two committees would make her nominations illegal. This started a heated debate between administration and councillors, leading to the meeting running over, another break being given and a proceeding committee being postponed.
Provost Cooper had to repeat the ruling that the issue was not a matter for a full council discussion multiple times before saying that she would no longer take any points of order on the issue.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel