A FORMER police inspector has said she believes there was no adverse reaction in the days following Sheku Bayoh’s death because the community “trusted the police”.

Jane Combe, 52, who retired from the force three years ago, told an inquiry into the 31-year-old’s death that there was no perception in the community of “a big cover up” by Police Scotland.

Bayoh died in handcuffs and sustained multiple injuries after officers responded to calls from the public about a man brandishing a knife and behaving erratically on a Sunday morning in Kirkcaldy, Fife, in May 2015.

His family believe race played a part in his death.

When senior counsel to the inquiry Angela Grahame QC asked Combe why she believed this at the time, she replied: “It’s based on the fact that there were no demonstrations or protests bar one that I am aware of.”

The National: Sheku Bayoh died in police custody three years ago (Family handout/PA)

When asked to give more detail on the one event she remembers in response to Bayoh’s (above) death, she described the moment his family came to Kirkcaldy police station.

“That was for me a very peaceful, dignified one, more like a vigil opposed to a demonstration,” she told the inquiry.

“There was no hostility, it wouldn’t be what I would class as a demonstration.”

Grahame, addressing the witness, said: “So when we’re thinking about reaction from the community or in particular from the family, it wasn’t any noisy, difficult demonstration?”

Combe shook her head in response.

Grahame then asked: “You’ve said the local community trusted police … was that the local black community?”

The witness replied: “All community.”

Claire Mitchell QC, acting on behalf of the Bayoh family, made a submission to the inquiry to question the witness further on her answers.

She asked Combe to give more detail on the one event in Fife which she could remember in the wake of Bayoh’s death.

The inquiry heard it was a large-scale march that stopped outside Kirkcaldy police station.

Mitchell said demonstrations and protests can be peaceful and legal, adding: “The inquiry will come to hear that there will be evidence that the Bayoh family in fact stood with a banner that said ‘We Want Answers’ and ‘Without Truth There Can Be No Justice’.”

Earlier, the inquiry saw a statement from Combe in which she said: “Following the tragic incident, there were concerns that there would be a negative and adverse reaction from the ethnic minority in Fife and a breakdown in our engagement with these communities which could manifest in demonstration and protest, however due to the continued positive community engagement and dialogue, this was avoided.”

Mitchell asked the witness if she was aware of a breakdown in relations between the police, the family liaison officers and the Bayoh family in the days following Bayoh’s death.

Combe said she had not been.

Mitchell then asked Combe if it was one of her concerns that because Bayoh was black there might be an adverse reaction to his death.

The witness said “potentially, yes”, adding: “If I am being perfectly honest, it’s after anything, whether it’s worldwide or the country, if it’s ethnic minority the media will come on the back of that.”

Combe told the inquiry she never saw officers under her command in Fife being racist, but admitted it would be “naive” to say it did not exist in the force.

Earlier in the inquiry, three doctors who examined a police officer who was allegedly stamped on by Bayoh in the minutes before his death as he was restrained said she did not have any obvious, significant injuries.

READ MORE: Police officer had no obvious injury after Sheku Bayoh confrontation, doctors tell inquiry

Previously, officers Ashley Tomlinson and Craig Walker had told the inquiry they had witnessed Bayoh punch former officer Nicole Short, after which she fell on the ground and he then “stomped” on her back.

Doctors Katherine Mitchell and Gillian Norrie, who examined Short in the aftermath of the confrontation, told the inquiry they had made no note at the time of any injuries that would match being stamped on.

Dr Ian Anderson, who assessed Short some 18 days later, said she had bruises but he claimed her injuries were not consistent with a stamping injury.

Speaking at the inquiry on Friday, Dr Rudy Crawford, who was asked to review Short’s records for the Crown Office, said: “I do agree to the extent that she didn’t have any signs of a serious injury, but my concern is that you could not exclude a stamping injury based on that alone,” adding there was no sufficient alternative explanation for the injuries she did sustain.

The inquiry, before Lord Bracadale, continues.