A GOVERNMENT minister has admitted he is considering lying to the public if a vote of no confidence is called in Boris Johnson.
In the wake of the Sue Gray report, a vote of no confidence is looking increasingly likely with more than 45 Tory MPs publicly declaring their lack of trust in the Prime Minister.
A total of 54 letters must be sent to 1922 Committee chair Sir Graham Brady to trigger the ballot, but it is not clear how many have been submitted.
Speaking to The Times, one anonymous Tory minister said he was struggling with his conscience regarding the vote.
He said: "I can live with sending out emails where I contort myself into evermore elaborate positions saying why I don’t think this is a resigning matter, because that’s politics – your integrity is chipped away marginally for the greater good.
“But if those letters do go in, I have no choice but to make a decision.
“But I just don’t know if I can vote confidence in him. I haven’t had any confidence in him for a long time, but I never thought we’d get a confidence vote.
“And then there’s whether I can lie in public and I say I voted confidence. I don’t know whether I can.
“There’s others on the payroll who feel the same, they are just more reconciled to lying about it.”
It comes after a Church of England bishop joined calls for Johnson to resign, saying he “obviously” lied over lockdown parties in Downing Street.
The Rt Rev Dr Alan Wilson, the Bishop of Buckingham, said the Prime Minister’s claims he did not realise what was going on were “nonsense” and that the UK needed a leader it could trust.
His intervention came on a day where Johnson was booed by some in the crowd as he arrived with his wife, Carrie, to attend the national service of thanksgiving for the Queen at St Paul’s Cathedral.
Tory MPs who have been pressing for the Prime Minister to stand down following the final report by Sue Gray into lockdown violations in Whitehall appear to have decided to stay quiet during the Platinum Jubilee celebrations.
But asked on Times Radio if Johnson should resign, Dr Wilson said: “The only answer is yes. I’m an Army baby and what they used to say in the Army was you can trust anybody, but you can’t trust a liar.
“In all sorts of contexts, you have to be able to trust the people who lead you, who represent you.”
He said the Prime Minister’s excuses – “oh I didn’t realise, I was ambushed by a cake” – were clearly nonsense and that he was “obviously” an out and out liar.
“Actually, you can see it from a mile off, but it’s all nonsense. And most ordinary people realise it’s all nonsense. It’s not the parties actually. It’s the lying. I think that’s the problem,” Dr Wilson said.
“I mean, everybody makes mistakes. And I think people are very tolerant about that. But I think it’s very difficult to trust a liar.”
Allies of the Prime Minister, including Home Secretary Priti Patel, have been urging the rebels to back off a no-confidence vote saying the UK would not thank them for turning in on themselves at a time when people are struggling with a cost of living crisis.
However, some observers at Westminster have predicted that a challenge could come as early as next week, with the former party leader, Lord Hague of Richmond warning that was Johnson was in “real trouble”.
Even if the 54 tally is not reached in the coming week, the Tories are facing a pair of difficult by-elections in Wakefield and Tiverton and Honiton later in the month which could be the trigger for a new tranche of letters if they are defeated.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel