HARRY Potter author JK Rowling has been dragged into a row about an alleged breach of right-to-roam laws on land she controls.
Walkers claim that a historical six-mile right-of-way through forestry land in the Scottish Borders has been blocked off, according to reports on the BBC.
Thistlelane Ltd, a firm with Rowling’s husband Neil Murray as director, owns the 290-hectare Sheperdscleuh estate as well as the 306-hectare Wardlaw estate.
The author herself has majority control over the firm, holding at least three-quarters of the shares.
READ MORE: Millionaire Better Together donor's estate 'breaking public access laws'
The BBC reported that, while the company has confirmed “issues” are being thrashed out with locals about their rights of access, it has denied breaching any legislation.
Photos provided to the BBC appear to confirm allegations that no access signs have been put up on gates on the right of way.
The path in question is known as the Captain’s Road. It runs from the Tibbie Shiels Inn at the south end of St Mary’s Loch, west of Selkirk.
The six-mile route runs through to Hopehouse on Ettrick Water.
Gordon Harrison, a former chair of the Ettrick and Yarrow Community Council who took part in the original negotiations with landowners when re-establishing sections of the Captain's Road, said there had been “continuous hurdles put up to prevent people using the route”.
He told the BBC: "The latest is them planting saplings across the right-of-way and not offering any alternative routes – those saplings will quickly become large trees and it will be impossible to walk or cycle through there."
Charlotte Cavey-Wilcox, from Thistlelane’s agent Scottish Woodlands, said: "We are currently liaising closely with Scottish Forestry, Scottish Borders Council and the Ettrick and Yarrow Community Development Company to try and resolve the issues.
"Members of the public have a right to responsible access under Scottish legislation and the terms of the Scottish Outdoor Access code and these rights have not been restricted within Shepherdscleuch Forest."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel