THE LibDems will table a motion in the House of Commons in a bid to force the Government to release the minutes of a secretive meeting between Boris Johnson and Sue Gray.
The Prime Minister reportedly recently met civil servant Gray face to face as the full version of her report is due to be published later this week.
Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi struggled to defend the PM on the Sunday broadcast rounds and repeatedly insisted he did not know who called the meeting or what had been discussed.
READ MORE: One in five Scots out of money before payday, Citizens Advice Scotland poll shows
Allies in Gray’s camp told the Guardian that the request came from Johnson’s team, while Downing Street maintains that Gray made the approach - but conceded they couldn’t rule out that approach was in response to an initial prompt from Number 10.
Johnson later refused to answer questions relating to the meeting. However, by noon on Monday, Downing Street admitted the meeting was first suggested by Number 10 officials.
Labour have said reports of a secretive meeting with Gray are a “new low” for the Tory government.
In response, the LibDems are set to lay a Humble Address motion in parliament calling on the Government to publish the details of the meeting - including who arranged it.
The first iteration of the Gray report was only 12 pages long due to the Met investigation
The motion will also call for the publication of all contact between Johnson and Gray during the course of the inquiry into breaches of coronavirus regulations in Downing Street.
Liberal Democrat chief whip Wendy Chamberlain, MP for North East Fife, will lay the motion in Parliament, following speculation over the origin and contents of the meeting between Johnson and Gray.
Chamberlain MP said: “The public would be rightly angry if it turns out Boris Johnson put pressure on Sue Gray to water down her report into illegal Downing Street parties. A lack of transparency at this pivotal moment risks undermining the entire inquiry.
READ MORE: Monkeypox: First case recorded in Scotland
“Johnson repeatedly stood up in Parliament and said this report would be completely independent, and would provide answers about the rule-breaking parties in Number 10.
“We deserve to know whether this meeting really was an attempt to turn the report into a Downing Street stitch-up.
“If the Government refuses to release the minutes of this meeting, then Liberal Democrats will use powers in Parliament to force them to.”
The draft text of the Humble Address motion reads: "That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, that she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid before this House the minutes from or any notes of any meeting or meetings, or any written or electronic correspondence between the Prime Minister and Sue Gray since the start of her investigation into alleged gatherings on government premises during Covid restrictions"
LibDem MP Chamberlain will lay the motion in parliament
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said reports that the PM held a secret meeting with Gray was a “new low” for the Government.
During a tour of a large Sainsbury’s store in Nine Elms, south London, on Monday, Starmer urged for Gray’s full report into partygate to be published as soon as possible.
He told journalists: “I always had a concern that as we got to the publication of the Sue Gray report, there will be attempts by the Government to undermine her and undermine the report.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: I’ve been knocked for six by ‘nasty’ Covid-19
“That’s what we’ve seen going on over the weekend in recent days, a new low for the Government.
“What we do know is there was industrial-scale law-breaking in Downing Street – over 120 fines. So what we need now is the full report, all of the evidence.
“It’s the least the public is entitled to from this Government.”
Starmer with Sainsbury's Chief Executive Officer Simon Roberts (right) during a visit to Sainsbury's at Nine Elms, south London
Johnson earlier insisted Gray was “of course” able to act independently but declined to answer questions about a meeting he had with the senior civil servant about her report into partygate.
The PM said he would not give a “running commentary” but “it can’t be long now” before the report is out, adding he could say more then.
Asked if the report was still an independent one, the PM said: “Of course, but on the process you are just going to have to hold your horses a little bit longer.
“I don’t believe it will be too much longer and then I will be able to say a bit more.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson must come before parliament to explain rule-breaking, says Ian Blackford
The PM’s official spokesman, asked whether No 10 officials told Gray’s team that Johnson would like to meet her, told reporters: “No, this was not at the request of the Prime Minister.
“It wasn’t framed in that way. It was suggested it may be helpful to have that meeting.
“Obviously Sue Gray is independent, it is up to her whether she proceeds with any meeting with regards to her investigation.”
Asked to clarify which of the two parties suggested a meeting could be helpful, the spokesman replied: “No 10 officials.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here