CULTURE Secretary Nadine Dorries has described Channel 4 News as “edgy” and said the programme sometimes has not done itself “any favours” in terms of impartiality.
Appearing before a Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee session about online safety and public service broadcasters, she was asked what she thought of the programme.
Dorries said she “gets on really well” with presenter Cathy Newman and had been asked on by her a number of times in the past two weeks.
Apparently referring to eyewitness reports that former anchor Jon Snow shouted “F*** the Tories” while at Glastonbury Festival five years ago, she added: “I have been on Channel 4 News a number of times.
READ MORE: 'Nick Robinson has cost the BBC a lot of money', furious Tory Culture Minister says
"It is edgy. I am not going to justify a news programme whose anchor went out shouting obscenities about the Conservative Party.
“So they didn’t do themselves any favours sometimes on the news programme and I think that is probably as much as I want to say about that.”
Dorries was also questioned about the Government’s decision to sell off Channel 4.
The broadcaster has been publicly owned since its creation in 1982 by the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher, and is entirely funded by advertising.
Dorries said she “can’t see a scenario” in which a privately owned Channel 4 would become partly or wholly subscription based.
She told the committee: “As a public service broadcaster that is not on the table, that is just not on the cards at all. I can’t see a scenario in which that would happen.”
The session also saw DCMS permanent secretary Sarah Healey defend her staff after Scottish National Party MP John Nicolson questioned why public appointments in the department were “so often a mess”.
She said: “I obviously don’t really agree with the premise of your question. We do the highest number of public body regulated appointments across Government. We do 41 bodies with public appointments that are regulated, a total of 435 roles to fill – that means we are doing around 90 on an annual basis.”
Nicolson highlighted the disrupted search for the new chair of the Charity Commission and the “the ongoing saga of Ofcom” which he said had ended with “an elderly peer who doesn’t use social media, which seems extraordinary in 2022”.
Conservative peer Lord Grade, 79, who is a former television executive, was recently appointed to the broadcasting watchdog after a lengthy process that had to be re-run.
Healey said: “Obviously there are some instances, particularly some high-profile appointments which have not gone as swiftly or efficiently as we would have liked over the last couple of years, but I don’t think that undermines the absolutely excellent job that my appointments team do of getting through 90-plus appointments every year, most of them without any issues whatsoever.”
Dorries was also quizzed on why she has refused to go on Channel 4 to answer why she wants to privatise the broadcaster.
Why won't Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries go on Channel 4 news to answer questions about why she wants to privatise it?
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) May 19, 2022
"It's my right to do so... which media outlet I chose to appear on is my choice," she tells Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Committeehttps://t.co/EZgaSFNXjg pic.twitter.com/V36oM7xSKG
She defended herself, saying: "It's my right to do so".
Nicolson, who asked the question looked confused at the short response before asking, "Is the answer finished?"
Dorries then lifted her arms and shrugged.
READ MORE: Comedian Nish Kumar on independence, the BBC, Nadine Dorries and performing in Scotland
Nicolson replied: "Well of course it's your right to do so. It goes without saying that accountability is a thing we expect from cabinet secretaries.
"And you'd rather think a pretty important audience to explain your policy and what you want to do is the audience that would be most affected by the decision."
Dorries said she has had a number of media interviews on Channel 4, adding that she is "very happy to answer any questions" before reiterating that "any media outlet I chose to appear on is my choice".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel