AN independent Scotland will follow the example of Sweden in joining Nato without having nuclear weapons, an SNP MP has said.
Alison Thewliss also dismissed a suggestion by a Tory MP that the SNP’s stance on abolishing nuclear weapons is “nuts” – arguing that holding such defences does not make the world safer.
On a visit to the US this week, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that joining the EU and Nato would be "cornerstones of an independent Scotland’s security policy".
On BBC Two’s Politics Live show, Thewliss was quizzed on how this would square with wanting to remove nuclear deterrents from Scotland.
READ MORE: Joining Nato would be 'vital' to an independent Scotland's security, says Nicola Sturgeon in US
She said: “I think we square that in exactly the same way that Sweden has done so."
The SNP MP acknowledged Sweden would not be removing nuclear weapons, but said: “They are saying very clearly in their agreement with Nato that they put in today that they do not want nuclear bases on their shores at all.”
“We see the important of that alliance – not of the nuclear deterrent,” she added.
Patrick O’Flynn, a political commentator and former Ukip MEP, claimed Sturgeon was seeking a “free ride” under the Nato nuclear umbrella without doing the “slightly gritty stuff of hosting the submarines”.
He added: “That is why I think it is very important that independence referenda happen once in a generation, and it means that because we have taken decisions to carry on putting most of nuclear defence infrastructure in Scotland, partly based on the 2014 decision to stay within the United Kingdom.
READ MORE: Greens oppose Nato membership for Scotland and 'evil' nuclear weapons
Tory MP Laura Farris described the SNP’s stance on abolishing nuclear weapons as “absolutely nuts”.
She went on: “The SNP saying we will get rid of the nuclear submarines is saying we will disarm the United Kingdom, and the United Kingdom has to make a decision whether now, at the most dangerous moment since the end of the Cold War - or the Scottish people might need to make a decision - if they want to live in a country that has no nuclear weapons and completely reduces our defence.”
But Thewliss dismissed her claim, saying: “Most countries in the world don’t have nuclear weapons, don’t seek to have nuclear weapons. If it were the case nuclear weapons made everyone safer, everyone would have them – and they don’t and they actively choose not to.
READ MORE: Stephen Kerr criticised over claims on Scotland's EU and Nato chances
“The SNP believe very firmly these weapons cannot be used – because if you were to use them, as Russia has been threatening to do, you are on the brink of an apocalypse already.”
She added: “This should be an issue for the Scottish people to decide. Civil society in Scotland, the people in Scotland have long protested against nuclear weapons being based in our country, because we don’t think they make us safer, they make us a target.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel