THE Tories will continue to lead Scottish Borders Council after a coalition was formed in the wake of last week’s local elections.
When the votes were counted a week today, Friday, May 6, no political party or grouping was handed an overall mandate to take power unopposed in the council chamber.
The Scottish Tories had the most elected members with 14, followed by the SNP with nine, independents on seven, the LibDems three and the Greens with one, after returning their first-ever councillor in the region.
Over the following days negotiations were held between the different factions in a bid to find common ground and form a workable alliance.
READ MORE: Who controls Scotland's councils? Which party will take power and where
Now a deal has been struck with the Conservative group, led by Galashiels and District Councillor Euan Jardine, gaining the support of three of the independent councillors – Hawick and Hermitage’s Watson McAteer, Hawick and Denholm’s Stuart Marshall and Selkirkshire elected member Caroline Cochrane.
Councillor Jardine will lead the new administration and Councillor McAteer will serve as the local authority’s new convenor, replacing Councillor David Parker in that role.
McAteer said tackling local issues would be the priority for the new administration.
He said: “I am delighted to take the convener’s role which I hope will be beneficial to both the council and the people I represent.
“We have had very brief discussions at this early stage with our partners and there has been a strong, strong emphasis on re-setting the council agenda to be much more locally-focused and to concentrate on the core services of the council. That’s the language my colleagues Stuart and Caroline wanted to hear.
“We have been campaigning for a long time now to get waste and education and the railway included as key parts of the council’s agenda and we have got that absolute assurance, so that’s really good news. We want to focus in on the things that matter to the people we represent.”
At a meeting of Scottish Borders Council on Thursday, May 19, members will be asked to endorse the appointment of both the leader and convener.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel