ENGLAND'S Education Secretary has rejected calls from the country's Children's Commissioner to follow Scotland and Wales's lead and ban smacking.
Nadhim Zahawi said parents should be trusted to make their own decisions about whether to smack their children.
He said mothers and fathers are “entitled” to be able to discipline their youngsters.
Dame Rachel de Souza earlier told Times Radio she would be “supportive” if the Government decided to follow Scotland and Wales in banning physical punishment of children, suggesting it is something that should be considered in England.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer urges rUK to copy Welsh smacking ban – two years after Scots ban
But Zahawi said he did not believe the state should be “nannying” parents about the way they bring up their children.
“My very strong view is that actually we have got to trust parents on this, and parents being able to discipline their children is something that they should be entitled to do,” the minister told Times Radio.
“We have got to just make sure we don’t end up in a world where the state is nannying people about how they bring up their children.”
Wales last month made any type of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, illegal in the country.
Scotland introduced a similar ban in November 2020.
Souza earlier urged ministers to look at how the legislation moved through the Welsh assembly and said she would support a decision to follow suit.
“Scotland and Wales have done this (banned the physical punishment of children). So we’ve learnt a lot about what that would mean, as it goes into legislation,” she told Times Radio.
“I think we’ve got a great opportunity to look, watch it, as it’s embedded (in Wales), and I would be supportive — certainly, from what I’ve seen so far — I would be supportive if our Government decided to do the same.”
We are delighted that the Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotland) Bill has passed @ScotParl.#SPEqualProtection pic.twitter.com/h3FKMzxg0q
— Children in Scotland (@cisweb) October 3, 2019
Although Souza acknowledged that “protections” for children are already “enshrined in law” in England, she expressed admiration for the actions of the Scottish and Welsh governments, adding: “It’s certainly something that I think we should consider.”
In Scotland, the "smacking ban" was introuduced in The Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotland) Act 2019 which made it the first country in the UK to outlaw the punishment.
In Wales, it was brought in under the Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act 2020 and marks the end of the common law defence of “reasonable punishment”.
Parents or anyone who is responsible for a child while the parents are absent can now face criminal or civil charges if they are found to have physically disciplined a young person in any way.
Critics of the law change have said it will criminalise parents, but the Welsh Government insisted the move was about protecting children’s rights.
Labour leader Keir Starmer previously said the move should be mirrored in England and Northern Ireland, calling it “the right thing” to do.
A survey commissioned by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children found more than two-thirds of adults in England believe it is wrong for parents or carers to physically punish their child, with 58% thinking it was already illegal.
More than 60 nations worldwide have legislated against the physical punishment of children.
The Times reported that a government source said there were no plans to change the law in England.
Meanwhile, the Conservative chair of the Education Select Committee has called for a debate in the House of Commons on whether parents should be permitted to smack their children.
The MP for Harlow, Robert Halfon, said: “If I walked down to the frontbench and smacked the Leader of the House I would be possibly done for assault, if I smacked a dog I would be possibly done for cruelty to that dog.
"Yet, when we talk about the smacking of children, we say that it’s a nanny state if we question this – even though we tell parents they must put seatbelts in the back of cars for children’s safety.
“Now, whilst I am not calling for an outright ban on smacking children, I recognise that parents bring up children the best way they can, I do think that the Children’s Commissioner is courageous and right to raise these matters in The Times, as she has done, and I do think that we need to discuss these matters very carefully and have a debate.
"And so, can we have a debate when the House… after the Queen’s Speech, about smacking for children, whether it should be permitted?”
READ MORE: Government ditches equality conference after humiliating backlash, reports say
Commons Leader Mark Spencer said parents “have the right to chastise their children in a way in which they see fit”.
He replied: “I think it is something which is worthy of debate, I think colleagues across the House would want to engage with that debate. I will say on a personal level, I do think that parents have the right to chastise their children in a way in which they see fit.
“But there clearly is a line where that stretches over into abuse. You know, the authorities are very robust in making sure children are safe in the United Kingdom.
"But it is something which is worthy of debate and I would encourage him to apply for an adjournment debate or a backbench business debate.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel