MSPs failed to hold in their laughter as the SNP's Willie Coffey stood up to introduce a debate in the Scottish parliament on Tuesday – but prematurely gave his closing remarks.
The MSP for Kilmarnock and Irvine valley made the closing remarks to a debate which was yet to start before being stopped by Liam McArthur, the deputy presiding officer.
The debate was already off to a rocky start when McArthur called upon Coffey after pointing out the “unexplained absence of the convener”, Scottish Greens MSP Ariane Burgess.
READ MORE: MP forced to withdraw comment after calling Boris Johnson 'Pinocchio'
Coffey opened his closing remarks saying: "Thank you, Presiding Officer. I thought that I was closing the debate, so this is a closing speech, as I am sure members will soon hear.”
Coffey continued: “From my perspective, the debate has been immensely constructive, and I hope that it has been helpful in shaping the final version of NPF4, and a planning system and culture well-suited to delivering on its ambitions.
“Before reflecting on some of the contributions to this afternoon’s debate, which I am about to hear-”
Laughter was heard in Holyrood at this point in Coffey’s remarks.
The SNP MSP was eventually stopped by the deputy presiding officer, who said: “I will pause you there.
“This is not a reflection on your remarks, but I do not think that this is reflecting particularly well on the chamber, so I will suspend business for a brief period until we can establish where the convener is and we can recommence the debate.”
The debate continued shortly after once Burgess arrived.
The presiding officer called Burgess delay a “discourtesy to the chamber” and she apologised.
After the debate Coffey said he was “pleased – finally – to be closing what is an important debate, on behalf of our committee".
The incident, which happened a little before 3pm, has been removed from videos of the Holyrood chamber which are posted on the Scottish parliament website.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel