THE BBC has come under fire after a story appeared to suggest an English county was receiving a Westminster funding boost – despite it being a huge cut.
The BBC reported that Cornwall was receiving more than £100 million in funding from the UK Government as part of its Shared Prosperity Fund aimed at replacing EU funding.
The BBC’s headline read: “Cornwall to get £132 of funding for next three years”.
The broadcaster was criticised for its coverage, particularly its headline, as other media outlets had reported the news not as a funding boost, but as a funding cut.
READ MORE: The REAL Scottish Politics: Let's be clear on nature of BBC bias
Cornwall Council had asked the UK Government for £700m over the next seven years to match previous EU funding. The Tories said it was a "huge win" for the area, but critics pointed out it is less than half of what the EU had given.
News outlets such as ITV led with the headline “Cornwall set to get less than half of its replacement EU funding” while Cornwall Live’s headline read “Cornwall set to get less than half of its replacement EU funding but Conservatives welcome announcement”.
Oi, @BBCNewsPR. Shouldn't your headline be "Cornwall's funding cut by 56%"? pic.twitter.com/9NoFVWjjBW
— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) April 15, 2022
The BBC was slammed for its headline, with the Good Law Project’s Jo Maugham tweeting: “Oi, @BBCNewsPR. Shouldn't your headline be "Cornwall's funding cut by 56%’?”
The BBC is by far the largest news website in the world. It's almost impossible to overstate its influence.
— Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 (@uk_domain_names) April 15, 2022
So when it downplays something, that will have a massive impact.https://t.co/N9E4abAj9h pic.twitter.com/HUyTw7IwYj
Meanwhile, author Edwin Hayward tweeted: “The BBC has gone with a ludicrously bland headline. Presumably because Brexit is concerned.
"The story is that Cornwall was getting about £100 million a year before Brexit, so this is a gigantic cut. But can you tell from the headline? Absolutely not.”
And a Boris Johnson parody account even mocked the BBC for the article, saying: “Jolly decent of the BBC to announce Cornwall getting half the funding it would have had from the EU as if it's a good thing and forgetting to mention Brexit.”
In the third paragraph of the BBC story, it does mention that the country was expected to receive around £100m a year from the EU. But many readers were unhappy with how the article led on the funding announcement and not on it being a cut.
Its coverage of this story forms part of a wider criticism by some of the BBC’s general coverage of Brexit, with accusations the broadcaster is watering down its coverage of the issue.
Anger erupted after a segment aired on BBC Scotland’s The Seven and Reporting Scotland appeared to cut out the speaker's mentions of Brexit amid a discussion on the impact of food shortages.
National Farmers Union Scotland president Martin Kennedy had been discussing issues affecting farming, such as the war in Ukraine, Covid and Brexit.
The latter issue was included in a written version on the BBC’s website but appears to have been removed from the broadcast clip.
READ MORE: Dan Walker rejects claims about his BBC exit after string of high-profile departures
Figures such as Tony Blair’s former No 10 Comminations boss Alistair Campbell and SNP president Michael Russel accused the outlet of editorialising its Brexit coverage.
Campbell said there appeared to be “some sort of policy decision” to reduce mention of Brexit in reporting while Russell accused the broadcaster of “airbrushing” Brexit “out of existence”.
The BBC declined to comment on the issue but when asked on Twitter if the broadcaster had taken an “editorial direction … to avoid negative reporting of Brexit, as has been claimed”, BBC Scotland’s business and economy editor Douglas Fraser was dismissive.
He responded: “I have no idea what you’re on about. But I’m going to hazard a guess that the ‘has been claimed’ part was a fantasy.”
The BBC has declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel