FORMER SNP MP Natalie McGarry has been accused in court of using a pro-independence group’s funds to “cover her own expenses”.
Accountant Elizabeth Young, who helped Women for Independence, told Glasgow Sheriff Court on Thursday that there were concerns around the finances when she started at the campaign group, which grew when she tried to get information from McGarry.
The former MP is also alleged to have, on one occasion, asked dinner guests to pay for the shopping used to prepare the meal.
Young, 37, said: “I saw the pattern. As funds ran low there would be a lodgement of funds from Women for Indy, by PayPal or cheque, sent. It was being deposited to cover her own personal expenses.
“Funds ran low, some more money would come in. Obviously that was a warning.”
McGarry faces two counts of embezzlement, which she denies.
The 40-year-old is accused of embezzling £4,661.02 from the Glasgow Regional Association of the SNP between April 9, 2014 and August 10, 2015, and also of embezzling £21,000 between April 26, 2013 and November 30, 2015 while she was treasurer of Women for Independence.
Young told the court she had asked for information about where money had been spent for months, with the 14-strong jury being shown copies of emails between her, McGarry, and other members of the campaign organisation.
After McGarry was elected to serve Glasgow East in May 2015, the court was told, Young was asked around to the then MP’s home and was told it would be an opportunity to discuss the accounts.
But, she told the court, when she arrived there was another guest there.
Young said: “When we were there I think that was the first time I had some concerns. Natalie had a story about, I think her partner had taken a bank card and had no money, and asked the other guest to pay for shopping to make dinner with.
“It stuck in my mind as a bit of a strange thing to happen. It seemed an odd event to invite people around for dinner then asking them if they would pay for it.”
McGarry sat in the dock and listened as chartered accountant Young explained to Sheriff Tom Hughes and the jury that in November 2015, Women for Independence contacted the police about what had been uncovered.
Young told the court there was a 40% gap between what the group had collected and what had been spent.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article