THE Scottish Government has been told to apologise to the Gypsy Traveller community for historic injustices.
Davie Donaldson, a Scottish Traveller and campaigner, told MSPs on Tuesday that the Government should say sorry for the “forced separation and forced sedentarisation” of Gypsy Traveller people.
Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called “tinker experiment” – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of the community, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in.
When families became too big to be housed in the huts, children would sometimes be taken away.
The practice has been likened to “cultural genocide” by campaigner Shamus McPhee – who was born into one such site in Perth and Kinross.
Repeated calls have been made in recent years for an apology but one has not been forthcoming from the Scottish Government.
Addressing the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee on Tuesday, Donaldson said: “A point that I want to raise, and a point that’s been raised by many activists for decades now, is the fact that we still have no government apology for the cultural trauma and what has been termed as ‘cultural genocide’ of Gypsy Travellers throughout the 20th century.
“I just hope that in 2022, in this year of Scotland’s stories, that this will be the year that Government will strongly consider making an apology, strongly consider recognising the impact of cultural trauma on today’s inequalities and tell Scotland’s Gypsy Traveller story in full.”
Donaldson hopes that recent apologies from the Scottish Government for pre-devolution actions – including the execution of women branded witches by the Witchcraft Act of 1563 – may open the door for such a gesture.
“I think the apology is something that will be very welcomed, we have been pushed back with the apology in recent years,” he said.
“I think with the apology given to the LGBT community and others, of course for actions prior to this administration, as well as the First Minister’s apology for the burning of witches – something that happened a good long time before devolution – I think the argument is there that even though this happened prior to devolution an apology should still be made and would be very welcomed.”
The activist cautioned, however, that an apology would not fix all of the issues facing the Gypsy Traveller community in Scotland.
“However, I would urge that if an apology is to be made, it’s made with an understanding that an apology in and of itself will not fix things and that this cultural trauma really does intersect with all of the inequalities that Gypsy Travellers are continuing to face in our country,” he said.
“I would certainly urge for a conversation to begin around what can we do to resolve that cultural trauma? What can we do to make sure that the history of this trauma is told?”
Dr Lynne Tammi, of human rights organisation AyeRight, said that an apology would be good for those for whom it would provide “peace”, but said a better approach may be through a post-Apartheid South Africa-style truth and reconciliation commission.
“There needs to be opportunities to speak and for those who want to speak to speak to the ongoing trauma and what is still in your DNA,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel