NAZANIN Zaghari-Ratcliffe has condemned a succession of Tory foreign ministers who for six years failed to secure her release from prison in Iran.
Speaking in public for the first time at a press conference after being freed, the British-Iranian mother looked relaxed and happy as she paid tribute to her “amazing, wonderful” husband Richard Ratcliffe.
She thanked him for “tirelessly” campaigning for her freedom, while he said the family are looking forward to a “new chapter”.
The couple were joined by seven-year-old daughter Gabriella who sat in the front row at Portcullis House in central London.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who was detained on April 3 2016 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard at Imam Khomeini airport after a holiday visit with Gabriella to her parents, thanked those who campaigned for her release, saying she was “powerless” in prison.
The 43-year-old landed back in Britain on Thursday after the UK finally agreed to settle a £400 million debt dating back to the 1970s.
During the press conference, she criticised the Government for the length of time it took to secure her release.
Referencing her husband thanking the Government a few moments earlier, she said: “I do not really agree with him on that level.”
Zaghari-Ratcliffe said she had seen five foreign secretaries over the course of six years, adding: “That is unprecedented given the politics of the UK. I love you Richard, respect whatever you believe, but I was told many, many times that: ‘Oh we’re going to get you home.’ “That never happened.”
She said this resulted in her finding it difficult to place trust in them, adding: “I mean, how many foreign secretaries does it take for someone to come home? Five?”
Asked if she feels angry with the Government that it took so long to get her home, she said: “I think the answer is clear. I cannot be happier than this that I’m here.
“But also, this should have happened six years ago.”
In 2017, then foreign secretary Boris Johnson told MPs that Zaghari-Ratcliffe had been in Iran “training journalists”. The bogus claim was jumped on by Iranian authorities, who said it was proof Zaghari-Ratcliffe was lying about her reasons for being in the country. Johnson later apologised.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe told reporters: “I’m not going to live for the rest of my life with a grudge over the past six years.”
She said what happened to her was “cruel”, adding: “This moment is so glorious for me.”
Zaghari-Ratcliffe said it took a “very, very long time” for politicians to sort it out.
Reflecting on her return to the UK, she said she was “overwhelmed” when she landed.
“That moment was precious. I’ve been waiting for that moment for such a long time. And I was overwhelmed, specifically to get to know Gabriella and Richard after such a long time.
“It was a very, very emotional moment,” she said.
Speaking of her experience, Zaghari-Ratcliffe said: “It will always haunt me. There is no other way around it. It will be with me.”
She said it is “very difficult” for her to talk about what she has been through.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe said she was told early on that there was something Iran wanted from Britain and that she would not be released until they got what they wanted.
“So, I didn’t know the details at the time. But I think it was the week two or week three that I was arrested, like six years ago, that they told me: ‘We want something off the Brits. We will not let you go until such time that we get it.’ “And they did keep their promise.”
She urged an end to the detention of other dual nationals still held in Iran, saying without their release “the meaning of freedom is never going to be complete”.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe highlighted the continued detention of British-US national and wildlife conservationist Morad Tahbaz, who, according to his family, has gone on hunger strike after he was taken back into prison after just 48 hours on furlough.
She told reporters at Portcullis House: “I believe that the meaning of freedom is never going to be complete as to such time that all of us who are unjustly detained in Iran are reunited with our families.
“To begin with Morad, but also the other dual nationals, members of religious groups, or prisoners of conscience who are … I mean, we do realise that if I have been in prison for six years there are so many other people we don’t know their names who have been suffering in prison in Iran.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel