AMNESTY International UK have urged MPs to follow the House of Lords and reject the “deeply authoritarian” provisions of the new policing bill as it returns to the Commons for debate on Monday.
In January, the UK Government’s hopes for the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill were dealt a serious blow by the House of Lords, which rejected a number of measures included in the bill, including suspicionless stop-and-search related to protest and ‘Serious Disruption Prevention Orders’, which would effectively ban specific protests.
However, there is still the possibility that certain controversial measures may become law if they are not defeated by MPs, including the creation of a "buffer zone" around parliament, giving police the power to impose noise-based restrictions on protests, the criminalisation of one-person protests and new restrictions on public assembly.
READ MORE: WATCH: Scots wheelchair stunt activist hits out at Policing Bill
Ahead of the Bill returning to parliament for MPs to reconsider the Lords’ amendments, over 800,000 people have signed a petition against the Bill coordinated by human rights groups, environmentalists and Gypsy, Roma and Traveller advocates, while over 350 charities have signed a letter calling for the Bill to be scrapped.
Amnesty UK’s CEO Sacha Deshmukh commented: “The extensive cross-party opposition from the Lords shows the Government got it wrong on this one and MPs should reject the deeply authoritarian provisions of this Bill, which fly in the face of the values and historic liberties of this country.
“The right to protest is fundamental to a free and fair society. Protest is a cherished part of British history - from the anti-slavery movement, to the suffragettes and recent anti-war marches.
“The police simply do not need vast new powers to arrest ordinary people exercising their right to protest.”
Deshmukh continued: “This bill will also further entrench racism and discrimination in British policing.
“A huge expansion in stop-and-search powers is likely to have hugely disproportionate impacts on Black people, who are already much more likely to be stopped and searched, to be Tasered or even to die in police custody.
“We hope to see MPs standing up for the basic rights and freedoms of their constituents by rejecting this dangerous power grab”.
READ MORE: Preventing justice is latest example of why we can do better than Westminster
Three UN special rapporteurs have warned that the Bill could threaten our rights, while Parliament’s own Joint Committee on Human Rights described its proposals as “oppressive and wrong.”
Additionally over 600 health and social care professionals have warned that the new policing provisions in the Bill would require them to breach confidentiality and put young people’s safety at risk, while over 80 leaders in LGBT+ advocacy have said that the Bill threatens progress made towards LGBT+ equality.
Following the House of Lords’ vote last month, Liberty director Martha Spurrier commented: “The Bill, and the last minute amendments they tried to sneak through, are typical of a government that despises scrutiny and rejects accountability, which thinks the powerful should be above the law, even if it comes at the expense of everybody else’s human rights.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel