THE Scottish Greens have warned that the Scottish Government’s new hunting bill will only receive their backing if it delivers a “watertight” ban on foxhunting.
Published today for parliament’s consideration, the Hunting with Dogs Bill is intended to protect foxes, hares and other wild animals from being chased and killed by packs of wild dogs by closing loopholes and making the law clearer through the replacement of existing legislation.
However, the bill would allow dogs to be used to search for, stalk or flush certain wild mammals, though only for specified purposes and if the activity in question meets certain requirements, such as preventing serious damage to livestock, timber or crops, preventing the spread of disease, or protecting human health.
The conditions for this would include using no more than two dogs unless a licence has been granted, keeping any dog used under control, and obtaining permission from the person who owns or manages the land in question. The bill would nevertheless ban the activity of "trail hunting".
READ MORE: UK Government faces backlash over foie gras and fur import ban 'U-turn'
The Greens have responded to the bill’s publication by arguing that the Scottish Government’s own independent review suggested its proposed approach would not make a difference.
Scottish Green spokesperson for rural affairs Ariane Burgess said: “Most people think foxhunting is already banned in Scotland, but loopholes in the law mean that hunting continues much as it did. Sadly, in its current form this bill closes one loophole while risks opening another so that this bloodthirsty practice can continue.
“Polls have repeatedly shown that the public back an outright ban, yet the Scottish Government continues to tinker around the edges. That’s why blood sports remain an area excluded from the Bute House Agreement and why this bill will need to deliver a real watertight ban if it is to get the backing of Scottish Green MSPs.”
Environment Minister Màiri McAllan commented: “I want to make clear that chasing and killing a mammal with a dog, for sport or otherwise, has no place in modern Scotland – indeed it has been illegal for twenty years. I am seeking to close loopholes which have allowed that already illegal activity to persist, and my aim is to do that in a way that ensures the greatest possible animal welfare while facilitating legitimate predator control.
“As well as closing existing loopholes, I am seeking to prevent others opening. We have seen from recent events south of the border, that trail hunting is sometimes being used as a cover for illegal hunting. We therefore plan to take pre-emptive action to prevent trail hunting becoming established in Scotland in order to reduce the risk of wild mammals being killed by dogs.
“However, I should like to be clear, that foxes can cause significant harm to livestock, as well as other wildlife such as ground nesting birds – so it is important that farmers and land managers have access to control measures that are efficient and humane. This legislation provides that.
“We carefully considered the views of stakeholders and the public when developing the new legislation which I am confident is both progressive and balanced.”
READ MORE: Boxing Day fox hunt goes ahead as Scottish Greens renew call for outright ban
Director of the League Against Cruel Sports Scotland Robbie Marsland also said: “The League fully supports the intention behind the new bill and we look forward to seeing it in detail and working with the Scottish Government as it progresses through parliament with full scrutiny.
"After twenty years of flawed legislation it is critical that this bill addresses the need to reduce the pack of hounds to just two, and takes pre-emptive action to prevent trail hunting being established as a new 'sport' in Scotland.
"We want to see a bill that really bans hunting and doesn't contain new loopholes for hunters to exploit."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel