THE UK’s internal market post-Brexit has created tensions within the devolution settlement, a committee of MSPs has said.
Holyrood’s Constitution Committee said the Internal Market Act (IMA) placed more emphasis on open trade than regulatory autonomy, when compared to the EU single market.
The Internal Market Act was brought in by Westminster to regulate trade between the four nations of the UK in the wake of Brexit.
It was widely criticised as a "power grab", with a non-discrimination clause in the Act meaning that no UK nation can bar goods produced in another from being sold within their borders, even if those goods do not meet that nation's standards.
READ MORE: Tories 'governing by diktat' aim to drop laws around genetically modified plants
One example may see genetically modified foods produced in England, under rules the Tories are looking to bring in, sold in Scotland - despite Scots rules banning the production of such goods.
In a report on the internal market published on Tuesday, the MSPs said the fundamental basis of devolution was to decentralise power.
They said they also recognised the benefits of open trade across the UK.
Convener Clare Adamson (below) said: “We believe that policy innovation – being able to pass laws that are tailored to the situation in Scotland – is one of the key successes of devolution.
“As a committee, we believe it is essential that outside the EU, devolution continues to provide at least the same level of flexibility.
“However, we have found that UK IMA places more emphasis on open trade than autonomy for the Scottish Parliament compared to the EU single market.”
She continued: “The UK internal market has created tensions.
“We will seek answers from the UK and Scottish Governments on issues raised in the report, as well as continuing to work with our counterpart committees across the UK.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'undermining' the Scottish Government with 'authority' jibe
Angus Robertson, SNP MSP and Holyrood’s Constitution Secretary, said the committee was “quite rightly demanding answers from UK ministers given the overwhelming evidence of what the Act is doing to devolution”.
“The report could not be clearer: the Internal Market Act has the power to automatically disapply Scottish legislation, fundamentally undermining laws passed by the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government’s ability to deliver the manifesto commitments on which it was elected,” he said.
“It confirms the deep concerns the Scottish Government has held about the Act since it was introduced.
“Indeed, it concludes that the weight of the evidence suggests that the Act undermines the devolution settlement, limits the powers of the Parliament to improve standards in policy areas like animal welfare, and acts as a powerful disincentive to policy innovation.”
A UK Government spokesperson said after the UK left the European Union a “vast number of powers have returned to Holyrood, the Senedd and Stormont from Brussels, ensuring that they each have more powers compared to when the UK was inside the EU”.
“The UK Internal Market Act was introduced in 2020 to preserve the United Kingdom’s internal market as powers previously exercised by the EU return to the UK, allowing people and businesses to continue to work and trade freely across the whole of the UK, and further strengthening our Union,” they said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel