UNION leaders have criticised Scotland’s new railways boss, accusing the new publicly-owned firm of treating its workers “in a more confrontational and provocative way than any of their failed private sector operators”.
A Transport Scotland spokesman said it “did not recognise this interpretation of the meeting” and added that it was “disappointing that the union leaders have taken this approach which will cause misunderstanding and distress for their members”.
Rail unions Aslef, RMT, TSSA and Unite claimed Chris Gibb (below), the chief executive of state-owned Scottish Rail Holdings, planned to “downgrade terms and conditions”, that the operator had rejected a no compulsory redundancy agreement, and had plans to cut staff rights to negotiate over pay.
In a joint statement on behalf of the four unions after they met with Gibb, they said that “Scotland’s new rail operator has started its relationship with workers in a more confrontational and provocative way than any of their failed private operator predecessors – they must change their ways quickly”.
“To be threatened with compulsory redundancies and cuts to pay and conditions is an attack on key workers who have kept Scotland moving during the pandemic,” they added.
“We are bitterly disappointed that rather than meet in good faith and seek to rebuild industrial relations, Mr Gibb seems intent on repeating the mistakes of the past.
“This is not the type of publicly owned railway that Scotland needs or expects. The Scottish Government are now fully responsible for running Scotland’s railways, Cabinet Secretary Michael Matheson must intervene now.”
Abellio is to be stripped of its ScotRail contract from April 1, when the franchise will be brought under state-control. Staff will become part of the Scottish Government’s public pay policy, but the unions said this was “an attempt to undermine railway workers’ existing pay and negotiating terms and conditions”.
“All of this points to a plan to treat key workers as the key costs to cut and the Scottish Government must halt these tactics immediately,” the four unions demanded.
A Transport Scotland spokesman said: “Conversely, we welcome the recent engagement with the trade unions regarding the formal transfer to ScotRail Trains Limited on April 1. We are keen to ensure that every current member of ScotRail’s staff wishing to transfer to the new publicly controlled company with their current terms and conditions does so,” the spokesman said.
“Ongoing Tupe [regulations over the transfer of employees when a company is taken over] discussions will keep staff informed of all matters related to the transfer, including the ways public sector pay policy could be applied moving forward.”
He added: “This is a pay policy which continues to focus on sustainability, reducing inequalities and promoting wellbeing, in an extremely challenging fiscal context.”
ScotRail announced earlier this month that three ticket offices could close as part of changes – which will affect more than 100 stations on the network.
On Monday, Scottish peak and off-peak regulated fares are to go up by another 3.8%, with peak prices rocketing by 38% since the start of 2012.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel