THE Tory MP who cooked up the Boris Johnson was "ambushed by cake" line has added to the confusing situation by saying that the Prime Minister told him "there wasn't a cake".
Conor Burns attempted to explain away a rule-breaking gathering in Downing Street to celebrate Johnson's birthday to Channel 4 News by claiming that the PM was "ambushed with a cake".
In the interview, Burns attempted to cover for his boss by saying that the "party" was not "premeditated" in that invitations were not sent out.
It is understood that on June 19, 2020, staff "gathered briefly" in the Cabinet Room of Downing Street, shared cake and sang happy birthday despite social mixing indoors being banned at the time by rules set by the UK Government.
A Downing Street spokesperson has said that Johnson had been at the event for "less than 10 minutes" and it is alleged that 30 people attended.
Now, the Tory minister who started the "ambushed by cake" suggestion has added more confusion to the situation by saying that Johnson has told him there was no cake.
He told a Telegraph podcast - in which he also alleges that Johnson will win the next General Election "handsomely" - that there was no cake.
Asked by host Christopher Hope whether Johnson was actually "ambushed by a cake on his birthday", Burns said: "I learned a salutory lesson yesterday that you should never make a joke when you're doing a serious broadcast interview.
"I am told, under some authority, indeed from him, that there actually wasn't a cake."
Both host and guest laugh then at the absurdity of what they're discussing.
Hope then asks: "What is a birthday party without a cake?"
"A meeting," Burns responds. They both laugh again.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel