A “defenceless” two-year-old boy was murdered by his mother and her boyfriend after suffering a “catalogue of very significant” injuries in the weeks before he died, a court heard.
Kyrell Matthews died with 41 rib fractures, as well as significant internal bleeding and bruising, allegedly caused by “very forceful squeezing or blows”, prosecutors say.
Kyrell’s mother, Phylesia Shirley, and her then-boyfriend, Kemar Brown, deny murdering the boy at Shirley’s home in Thornton Heath, south London, on October 20 2019.
Opening the case at the Old Bailey on Tuesday afternoon, prosecutor Edward Brown QC told jurors: “What you will hear in the evidence amounts to no less than a determined pattern of repeated and significant assaults, on a completely defenceless and young child.
“And it will be no surprise to you that the effect of these injuries would have been real pain, not only on their infliction, of course, but also pain and discomfort after and following each violent episode.”
He added: “It is the prosecution case that the injuries were inflicted on that very young child by the defendants Phylesia Shirley or Kemar Brown or both of them.”
Shirley and Brown had been in a relationship for approximately a year when Kyrell died, a month after his second birthday.
Jurors heard Kyrell did not attend a nursery and so was in the full-time care of his mother, then aged 21.
Brown, however, spent almost all of his time at Shirley’s one-bedroom flat and regularly slept over, jurors were told.
Neither defendant was employed in the period leading up to Kyrell’s death, the court heard.
Prosecutor Mr Brown said: “They therefore together had constant and consistent care of the child.
“You immediately understand the relevance of that issue.”
Shirley, 24, and Brown, 28, of separate addresses in Thornton Heath, deny murder.
Brown also denies two further charges – causing or allowing death, and causing or allowing serious physical harm to a child.
Shirley has admitted allowing the death and allowing serious physical harm to a child.
The prosecution opening will continue on Wednesday, along with a short response from the defendants’ barristers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article