ASTRONOMERS believe they may have found a second supermoon 5500 light years away which is orbiting a planet the size of Jupiter.
Researchers spotted the giant exomoon candidate orbiting the planet Kepler 1708b, a world 5500 light years from Earth, in the direction of the Cygna and Lyra constellations.
The team involved in the research is led by David Kipping and his Cool Worlds Lab at Columbia University, which reported the first exomoon candidate in 2017.
The new exomoon is about a third smaller than the Neptune-sized moon that Kipping and his colleagues previously found orbiting a similar Jupiter-sized planet, Kepler 1625b.
READ MORE: NASA warns 'potentially hazardous' asteroid is heading towards Earth
If the sighting is confirmed, it could mean exomoons are as common in the universe as exoplanets, and that the moons are a feature of planetary systems.
But the team’s initial sighting of an exomoon is yet to be confirmed, so it could take years before the second exomoon is established.
Observations from other space telescopes are needed to verify the discovery.
“Astronomers have found more than 10,000 exoplanet candidates so far, but exomoons are far more challenging,” said Kipping, who has spent the last decade hunting for exomoons.
“They are terra incognita.”
It is thought the supermoon is orbiting a planet the size of Jupiter (NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute/PA)
In the current study, the researchers looked at the sample of the coldest gas giant planets captured by Nasa’s planet-hunting spacecraft, Kepler.
After scanning 70 planets in depth, they found just one candidate, Kepler 1708b, with a moon-like signal.
Kipping said both of the exomoons are likely to be made of gas that piled up under the gravitational pull caused by their enormous size.
He added that if there are other moons out there, they will be harder to spot as they are likely to be smaller.
“The first detections in any survey will generally be the weirdos,” he said. “The big ones that are simply easiest to detect with our limited sensitivity.”
Should the exomoons be confirmed, they may have the potential to reveal how and where life may have emerged in the universe.
Other astronomers have mixed views about the findings.
Eric Agol, an astronomy professor at the University of Washington, said he is doubtful this latest signal will turn out to be real, stating it could be a “fluctuation in the data, either due to the star or instrumental noise”.
Michael Hippke, an independent astronomer in Germany, said the candidate is “intriguing”.
The study has been published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Astronomy.
Buzz Aldrin is pictured during the Apollo 11 landing on the moon (PA)
In a separate study, scientists have said a “slushy” ocean of magma could be responsible for the composition of the crust of the Earth’s moon.
Researchers from the University of Cambridge and the Ecole normale superieure de Lyon said the composition could be the result of crystallisation.
It is thought the moon formed when two protoplanets collided and the larger became the Earth while the smaller became the moon.
As a result of the crash, the moon was very hot and crystals, which were inside the liquid magma, solidified over hundreds of millions of years.
READ MORE: Scotland aims for the stars with spaceport set for launch this year
Samples collected by Apollo 11 astronauts from the lunar highlands contain light rocks called anorthosites, which formed in the early days of the moon.
They are similar to anorthosites which were formed through the crystallisation of magma on Earth.
Chloe Michaut, from Ecole normale superieure de Lyon, said: “Since the Apollo era, it has been thought that the lunar crust was formed by light anorthite crystals floating at the surface of the liquid magma ocean, with heavier crystals solidifying at the ocean floor.
“This ‘flotation’ model explains how the lunar highlands may have formed.”
The peer-reviewed study has been reported in the Geophysical Review Letters journal.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here