THE Metropolitan Police is being sued over its refusal to investigate parties held on Downing Street during lockdown.
Good Law Project has previously threatened the London force with legal action over its failure to look into the mounting allegations.
The Met previously said it would not investigate reports of a slew of lockdown-busting parties held by the top levels of the Tory government “based on the absence of evidence and in line with our policy not to investigate retrospective breaches”.
READ MORE: Glaswegians give their verdict on Boris Johnson's Christmas party scandal
However, Good Law Project gave the Met two weeks to respond after publishing legal advice which suggested that those excuses could be unlawful.
Now, following revelations that Boris Johnson and his wife Carrie attended a party to which around 100 people were invited at the height of lockdown, the Met is being sued.
Good Law Project wrote on Twitter: “The Met seem to be operating a two-tier system, with one rule for those in power and one rule for everyone else. Enough. We're suing.”
The Met seem to be operating a two-tier system, with one rule for those in power and one rule for everyone else. Enough. We're suing. https://t.co/oaGIoMyFC2
— Good Law Project (@GoodLawProject) January 11, 2022
Elsewhere, they added: “In what other crime would police decline to investigate because the suspect assured them no rules had been broken?
“It is not good enough for the Met to delegate their investigative duties to the press and civil servants. We don’t believe they would make such concessions for anyone else accused of breaking the law.”
The non-profit said they had instructed Bindmans LLP, and Danny Friedman QC and Adam Wagner are acting as counsel.
READ MORE: Leaked email reveals mass invite to 'BYOB' lockdown bash at No 10
The legal case focuses specifically on a party allegedly held on December 18, 2020.
Good Law Project added: "If we win, it could have a knock-on effect for all the parties held at Downing Street. Those in power broke the rules - repeatedly. They should face the same consequences as everyone else."
Jo Maugham, the non-profit's director, added: "You can have the rule of law, or you can defer to the powerful. But you can't have both.
“Cressida Dick's cat will know that multiple criminal offences were committed. It shames the Met, and ultimately all of us, that she refuses to investigate."
Asked in December if the Met would investigate reports of lockdown breaches at No 10, Cressida Dick (above), the force’s head, said: “The answer is no, we are not investigating that and I can’t really comment on what did or didn’t happen there.”
On Monday, ITV published an email sent by Boris Johnson’s principal private secretary, Martin Reynolds, inviting around 100 people to “bring your own booze” to a party at No 10 on May 20, 2020.
Rules at the time allowed only two people from different households to meet outside, at a distance of two metres.
Responding to the publication, a spokesperson for Scotland Yard said: “The Metropolitan Police Service is aware of widespread reporting relating to alleged breaches of the Health Protection Regulations at Downing Street on May 20, 2020 and is in contact with the Cabinet Office.”
The cabinet secretary, Simon Case, had been tasked with investigating the parties held by the government in breach of lockdown rules. However, he stepped down to be replaced by Sue Gray after reports emerged that he had seen parties hosted in his own office.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel